[v2] maintainers: update for testpmd

  From: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>

Add Aman Singh as co-maintainer of testpmd.

Make the title description more accurate for this tool.

Signed-off-by: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
v2: update the section title
---
 MAINTAINERS | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

On 11/25/2021 10:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> From: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
> 
> Add Aman Singh as co-maintainer of testpmd.
> 
> Make the title description more accurate for this tool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> ---
> v2: update the section title
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d785363c5c..1b259a3d98 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1691,8 +1691,9 @@ M: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
>   F: app/test/sample_packet_forward.c
>   F: app/test/sample_packet_forward.h
>   
> -Driver testing tool
> +Networking features testing tool

"Networking features" scope is a little wide.
Not sure if "Networking features" or "Networking drivers" suits better,
according previous title it is for driver testing.

>   M: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> +M: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
>   T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
>   F: app/test-pmd/
>   F: doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/
>
  

25/11/2021 14:40, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 11/25/2021 10:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > -Driver testing tool
> > +Networking features testing tool
> 
> "Networking features" scope is a little wide.
> Not sure if "Networking features" or "Networking drivers" suits better,
> according previous title it is for driver testing.

Yes it is for drivers features.
I want to distinguish testpmd and other tools like test-flow-perf
which is also testing networking drivers.

Maybe "Networking drivers features testing tool" ?
  

On 11/25/2021 3:20 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 25/11/2021 14:40, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 11/25/2021 10:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> -Driver testing tool
>>> +Networking features testing tool
>>
>> "Networking features" scope is a little wide.
>> Not sure if "Networking features" or "Networking drivers" suits better,
>> according previous title it is for driver testing.
> 
> Yes it is for drivers features.
> I want to distinguish testpmd and other tools like test-flow-perf
> which is also testing networking drivers.
> 
> Maybe "Networking drivers features testing tool" ?
> 

ack
  

On 11/25/2021 4:04 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/25/2021 3:20 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 25/11/2021 14:40, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 11/25/2021 10:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> -Driver testing tool
>>>> +Networking features testing tool
>>>
>>> "Networking features" scope is a little wide.
>>> Not sure if "Networking features" or "Networking drivers" suits better,
>>> according previous title it is for driver testing.
>>
>> Yes it is for drivers features.
>> I want to distinguish testpmd and other tools like test-flow-perf
>> which is also testing networking drivers.
>>
>> Maybe "Networking drivers features testing tool" ?
>>
> 
> ack
> 

thinking twice what additional meaning does 'features' adds here,
"Networking drivers features testing"
vs
"Networking drivers testing"

Isn't "Networking drivers testing" implies features of drivers?
  

25/11/2021 17:31, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 11/25/2021 4:04 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 11/25/2021 3:20 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 25/11/2021 14:40, Ferruh Yigit:
> >>> On 11/25/2021 10:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>> -Driver testing tool
> >>>> +Networking features testing tool
> >>>
> >>> "Networking features" scope is a little wide.
> >>> Not sure if "Networking features" or "Networking drivers" suits better,
> >>> according previous title it is for driver testing.
> >>
> >> Yes it is for drivers features.
> >> I want to distinguish testpmd and other tools like test-flow-perf
> >> which is also testing networking drivers.
> >>
> >> Maybe "Networking drivers features testing tool" ?
> >>
> > 
> > ack
> > 
> 
> thinking twice what additional meaning does 'features' adds here,
> "Networking drivers features testing"
> vs
> "Networking drivers testing"
> 
> Isn't "Networking drivers testing" implies features of drivers?

Yes
I was trying to avoid being too generic,
because the same title could apply to flow-perf.
But not mentioning "performance" should be enough.

OK for "Networking drivers testing tool"