Message ID | 20230621170058.2740340-1-david.marchand@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D33042D16; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DDE4068E; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:01:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17F84003C for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:01:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1687366872; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J/2S69ohkaDw8UX0atGE391AF1VLzKuyOnsZgT21PrY=; b=CX6S4rGnfTQaYu81u1M9bkznw8t8WxXzvYpOY1D9X+8PxyHMUvfYVkX5IsnW9CoxovahG+ 9hiQCrYrHxgPFmYrLYlseZs/1WLkg5dFYld1f6W0mTwxErWOjWyGk3YWJtnbLAM/5DikrD UDymj2Jfr7+Vkau6RAeCkaWd4MHOK04= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-659-75iRtsJdOTqj2bUGiur5OQ-1; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:01:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 75iRtsJdOTqj2bUGiur5OQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18206870F09; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmarchan.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.210]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779C6492B01; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:01:06 +0000 (UTC) From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, bluca@debian.org, tredaelli@redhat.com, i.maximets@ovn.org, james.r.harris@intel.com, mohammed@hawari.fr Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Select optional libraries Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:00:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20230621170058.2740340-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20211117112847.7362-6-david.marchand@redhat.com> References: <20211117112847.7362-6-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org |
Series | Select optional libraries | |
Message
David Marchand
June 21, 2023, 5 p.m. UTC
This series is one implementation to try and please users who want to select more easily which parts of DPDK are built. It introduces a change in behavior for enabling deprecated libraries: this series is aimed at the next release but sent early as a demo of what changes are required. If no strong opposition is met, a deprecation notice will be sent for v23.07 to announce this change in v23.11. Changes since v3: - split kni cleanup, - split variable rename cleanup, - introduced a new meson option to control deprecated libraries activation, - simplified the actual implementation of enable_libs to mimic enable_drivers behavior,
Comments
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 07:00:54PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > This series is one implementation to try and please users who want to > select more easily which parts of DPDK are built. > > It introduces a change in behavior for enabling deprecated libraries: > this series is aimed at the next release but sent early as a demo of > what changes are required. > > If no strong opposition is met, a deprecation notice will be sent for > v23.07 to announce this change in v23.11. > > > Changes since v3: > - split kni cleanup, > - split variable rename cleanup, > - introduced a new meson option to control deprecated libraries > activation, > - simplified the actual implementation of enable_libs to mimic > enable_drivers behavior, > > > -- > David Marchand > > David Marchand (4): > kni: move IOVA build check > build: rename enabled libraries list > build: select deprecated libraries > build: select optional libraries > I think the first 2 patches should definitely go into 23.07. The latter two cause a change in how one needs to build DPDK with libs enabled, so we may want to push that out, and flag the change in advance. Since it's a relatively minor change, and a build-time one only, I'm fine with it going in either 23.07 or 23.11, as maintainers decide. Series-reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
22/06/2023 11:09, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 07:00:54PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > This series is one implementation to try and please users who want to > > select more easily which parts of DPDK are built. > > > > It introduces a change in behavior for enabling deprecated libraries: > > this series is aimed at the next release but sent early as a demo of > > what changes are required. > > > > If no strong opposition is met, a deprecation notice will be sent for > > v23.07 to announce this change in v23.11. > > > > > > Changes since v3: > > - split kni cleanup, > > - split variable rename cleanup, > > - introduced a new meson option to control deprecated libraries > > activation, > > - simplified the actual implementation of enable_libs to mimic > > enable_drivers behavior, > > > > > I think the first 2 patches should definitely go into 23.07. The latter two > cause a change in how one needs to build DPDK with libs enabled, so we may > want to push that out, and flag the change in advance. Since it's a > relatively minor change, and a build-time one only, I'm fine with it going > in either 23.07 or 23.11, as maintainers decide. > > Series-reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> Applied first 2 patches, thanks.