[2/4] devtools: handle section suppression
Checks
Commit Message
Even if rare, the check script should handle removing a section.
Fixes: 4bec48184e33 ("devtools: add checks for ABI symbol addition")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Comments
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 04:34:18PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Even if rare, the check script should handle removing a section.
>
> Fixes: 4bec48184e33 ("devtools: add checks for ABI symbol addition")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> index 8da7650..d5fad04 100755
> --- a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> +++ b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build_map_changes()
> # symbol rule below
> /^.*{/ {
> gsub("+", "");
> + gsub("-", "");
> if (in_map == 1) {
> sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
Don't you also need to add some logic in the symbol detection match rule to
print an appropriate indicator that a symbol is being removed? With just this
change, you will note that you are parsing a section, but you will never trigger
a symbol match
Neil
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:18 PM Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 04:34:18PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > Even if rare, the check script should handle removing a section.
> >
> > Fixes: 4bec48184e33 ("devtools: add checks for ABI symbol addition")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> > index 8da7650..d5fad04 100755
> > --- a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> > +++ b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build_map_changes()
> > # symbol rule below
> > /^.*{/ {
> > gsub("+", "");
> > + gsub("-", "");
> > if (in_map == 1) {
> > sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
> >
> Don't you also need to add some logic in the symbol detection match rule to
> print an appropriate indicator that a symbol is being removed? With just
> this
> change, you will note that you are parsing a section, but you will never
> trigger
> a symbol match
>
I do remember seeing a warning about the "-EXPERIMENTAL" section.
And this is why I added this.
But since then I reorganised my series and eliminated some parts... so you
are most likely right.
I will double check and repost.
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 7:16 PM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:18 PM Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 04:34:18PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
>> > Even if rare, the check script should handle removing a section.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 4bec48184e33 ("devtools: add checks for ABI symbol addition")
>> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 1 +
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> > index 8da7650..d5fad04 100755
>> > --- a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> > +++ b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build_map_changes()
>> > # symbol rule below
>> > /^.*{/ {
>> > gsub("+", "");
>> > + gsub("-", "");
>> > if (in_map == 1) {
>> > sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1;
>> > }
>> > --
>> > 1.8.3.1
>> >
>> >
>> Don't you also need to add some logic in the symbol detection match rule
>> to
>> print an appropriate indicator that a symbol is being removed? With just
>> this
>> change, you will note that you are parsing a section, but you will never
>> trigger
>> a symbol match
>>
>
> I do remember seeing a warning about the "-EXPERIMENTAL" section.
> And this is why I added this.
> But since then I reorganised my series and eliminated some parts... so you
> are most likely right.
> I will double check and repost.
>
>
Yes, you are right, I moved this out of another patch that I ended up not
sending.
But it makes no sense by itself.
I will drop this in v2.
Any comments on the other patches ?
Thanks Neil.
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 02:56:51PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 7:16 PM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:18 PM Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 04:34:18PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> >> > Even if rare, the check script should handle removing a section.
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: 4bec48184e33 ("devtools: add checks for ABI symbol addition")
> >> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 1 +
> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> >> b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> >> > index 8da7650..d5fad04 100755
> >> > --- a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> >> > +++ b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> >> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build_map_changes()
> >> > # symbol rule below
> >> > /^.*{/ {
> >> > gsub("+", "");
> >> > + gsub("-", "");
> >> > if (in_map == 1) {
> >> > sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1;
> >> > }
> >> > --
> >> > 1.8.3.1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Don't you also need to add some logic in the symbol detection match rule
> >> to
> >> print an appropriate indicator that a symbol is being removed? With just
> >> this
> >> change, you will note that you are parsing a section, but you will never
> >> trigger
> >> a symbol match
> >>
> >
> > I do remember seeing a warning about the "-EXPERIMENTAL" section.
> > And this is why I added this.
> > But since then I reorganised my series and eliminated some parts... so you
> > are most likely right.
> > I will double check and repost.
> >
> >
> Yes, you are right, I moved this out of another patch that I ended up not
> sending.
> But it makes no sense by itself.
> I will drop this in v2.
>
> Any comments on the other patches ?
> Thanks Neil.
>
No, I don't think I do, thanks for checking though!
Neil
>
> --
> David Marchand
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build_map_changes()
# symbol rule below
/^.*{/ {
gsub("+", "");
+ gsub("-", "");
if (in_map == 1) {
sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1;
}