[dpdk-dev,v5,02/26] eal: return error instead of panic for cpu init

Message ID 20170227161811.12309-3-aconole@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Aaron Conole Feb. 27, 2017, 4:17 p.m. UTC
  There may be no way to gracefully recover, but the application
should be notified that a failure happened, rather than completely
aborting.  This allows the user to proceed with a "slow-path" type
solution.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Patch

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
index bf6b818..81692e7 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ 
 #include <rte_launch.h>
 #include <rte_eal.h>
 #include <rte_eal_memconfig.h>
+#include <rte_errno.h>
 #include <rte_per_lcore.h>
 #include <rte_lcore.h>
 #include <rte_log.h>
@@ -740,6 +741,12 @@  static int rte_eal_vfio_setup(void)
 }
 #endif
 
+static void rte_eal_init_alert(const char *msg)
+{
+	fprintf(stderr, "EAL: FATAL: %s\n", msg);
+	RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s\n", msg);
+}
+
 /* Launch threads, called at application init(). */
 int
 rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
@@ -767,8 +774,11 @@  rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
 	/* set log level as early as possible */
 	rte_set_log_level(internal_config.log_level);
 
-	if (rte_eal_cpu_init() < 0)
-		rte_panic("Cannot detect lcores\n");
+	if (rte_eal_cpu_init() < 0) {
+		rte_eal_init_alert("Cannot detect lcores.");
+		rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
+		return -1;
+	}
 
 	fctret = eal_parse_args(argc, argv);
 	if (fctret < 0)