| Message ID | 20190603214737.14609-1-thomas@monjalon.net |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | Thomas Monjalon |
| Headers | show |
| Series |
|
| Related | show |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ci/Intel-compilation | fail | Compilation issues |
| ci/checkpatch | success | coding style OK |
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:48 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > The function rte_eth_dev_count() was marked as deprecated in DPDK 18.05 > in commit d9a42a69febf ("ethdev: deprecate port count function"). > It is planned to be removed after the next LTS release. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> > --- > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > index e2721fad6..8d4d89a85 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ Deprecation Notices > > + ``rte_eal_devargs_type_count`` > > +* ethdev: The function ``rte_eth_dev_count`` will be removed in DPDK > 20.02. > + It is replaced by the function ``rte_eth_dev_count_avail``. > + If the intent is to iterate over ports, ``RTE_ETH_FOREACH_*`` macros > + are better port iterators. > + > * vfio: removal of ``rte_vfio_dma_map`` and ``rte_vfio_dma_unmap`` APIs > which > have been replaced with ``rte_dev_dma_map`` and ``rte_dev_dma_unmap`` > functions. The due date for the removal targets DPDK 20.02. > -- > 2.21.0 > Out of curiosity (ok, not entirely, since I need to write some notices). Is there a rule for the order in which those entries are written? I can see a notice about ethdev later in the file. Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
04/06/2019 09:12, David Marchand: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:48 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ Deprecation Notices > > > > + ``rte_eal_devargs_type_count`` > > > > +* ethdev: The function ``rte_eth_dev_count`` will be removed in DPDK > > 20.02. > > + It is replaced by the function ``rte_eth_dev_count_avail``. > > + If the intent is to iterate over ports, ``RTE_ETH_FOREACH_*`` macros > > + are better port iterators. > > + > > * vfio: removal of ``rte_vfio_dma_map`` and ``rte_vfio_dma_unmap`` APIs > > which > > have been replaced with ``rte_dev_dma_map`` and ``rte_dev_dma_unmap`` > > functions. The due date for the removal targets DPDK 20.02. > > Out of curiosity (ok, not entirely, since I need to write some notices). > Is there a rule for the order in which those entries are written? Yes the order should be the same as for the features in the release notes. > I can see a notice about ethdev later in the file. Indeed, ethdev is supposed to be after EAL, it is my mistake. > Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst index e2721fad6..8d4d89a85 100644 --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ Deprecation Notices + ``rte_eal_devargs_type_count`` +* ethdev: The function ``rte_eth_dev_count`` will be removed in DPDK 20.02. + It is replaced by the function ``rte_eth_dev_count_avail``. + If the intent is to iterate over ports, ``RTE_ETH_FOREACH_*`` macros + are better port iterators. + * vfio: removal of ``rte_vfio_dma_map`` and ``rte_vfio_dma_unmap`` APIs which have been replaced with ``rte_dev_dma_map`` and ``rte_dev_dma_unmap`` functions. The due date for the removal targets DPDK 20.02.
The function rte_eth_dev_count() was marked as deprecated in DPDK 18.05 in commit d9a42a69febf ("ethdev: deprecate port count function"). It is planned to be removed after the next LTS release. Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> --- doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)