From patchwork Wed Feb 18 16:28:50 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Ananyev, Konstantin" X-Patchwork-Id: 3460 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CA3B478; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:29:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC07B475 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:29:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2015 08:29:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,602,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="687435834" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2015 08:29:00 -0800 Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (sivswdev02.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.46]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id t1IGSwDd030369; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:28:58 GMT Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id t1IGSwCt016445; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:28:58 GMT Received: (from kananye1@localhost) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with id t1IGSw9O016441; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:28:58 GMT From: Konstantin Ananyev To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:28:50 +0000 Message-Id: <1424276931-16380-3-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.4.1 In-Reply-To: <1424276931-16380-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> References: <1424276931-16380-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] doc: ACL - add description for different classification methods X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev --- doc/guides/prog_guide/packet_classif_access_ctrl.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/packet_classif_access_ctrl.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/packet_classif_access_ctrl.rst index e018c68..d2adbff 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/packet_classif_access_ctrl.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/packet_classif_access_ctrl.rst @@ -269,6 +269,22 @@ When creating a set of rules, for each rule, additional information must be supp When adding new rules into an ACL context, all fields must be in host byte order (LSB). When the search is performed for an input tuple, all fields in that tuple must be in network byte order (MSB). +Classification methods +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +After rte_acl_build() over given ACL context has finished successfully, it can be used to perform classification - search for a ACL rule with highest priority over the input data. +There are several implementations of classify algorithm: + +* **RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR**: generic implementation, doesn't require any specific HW support. + +* **RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SSE**: vector implementation, can process up to 8 flows in parallel. Requires SSE 4.1 support. + +* **RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_AVX2**: vector implementation, can process up to 16 flows in parallel. Requires AVX2 support. + +It is purely a runtime decision which method to choose, there is no build-time difference. +All implementations operates over the same internal RT structures and use similar principles. The main difference is that vector implementations can manually exploit IA SIMD instructions and process several input data flows in parallel. +At startup ACL library determines the highest available classify method for the given platform and sets it as default one. Though the user has an ability to override the default classifier function for a given ACL context or perform particular search using non-default classify method. In that case it is user responsibility to make sure that given platform supports selected classify implementation. + Application Programming Interface (API) Usage ---------------------------------------------