From patchwork Tue May 12 11:02:34 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" X-Patchwork-Id: 4683 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0247C568B; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:03:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B66376C for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:03:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2015 04:03:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,414,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="693593935" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2015 04:03:21 -0700 Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (sivswdev02.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.46]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id t4CB3Klj025721; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:03:20 +0100 Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id t4CB3I5V028745; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:03:18 +0100 Received: (from pdelarax@localhost) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with id t4CB3ETY028705; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:03:14 +0100 From: Pablo de Lara To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:02:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1431428560-25426-3-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.4.1 In-Reply-To: <1431428560-25426-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> References: <1430837034-21031-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <1431428560-25426-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] test/hash: improve accuracy on cycle measurements X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Cycles per hash calculation were measured per single operation. It is much more accurate to run several iterations between measurements and divide by number of iterations. Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara --- app/test/test_hash_func_perf.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_func_perf.c b/app/test/test_hash_func_perf.c index ba31c53..004c9be 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_func_perf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_func_perf.c @@ -82,21 +82,21 @@ static const char *get_hash_name(rte_hash_function f) static void run_hash_func_test(rte_hash_function f, uint32_t init_val, uint32_t key_len) { - static uint8_t key[RTE_HASH_KEY_LENGTH_MAX]; - uint64_t ticks = 0, start, end; + static uint8_t key[HASHTEST_ITERATIONS][RTE_HASH_KEY_LENGTH_MAX]; + uint64_t ticks, start, end; unsigned i, j; for (i = 0; i < HASHTEST_ITERATIONS; i++) { - for (j = 0; j < key_len; j++) - key[j] = (uint8_t) rte_rand(); - - start = rte_rdtsc(); - f(key, key_len, init_val); - end = rte_rdtsc(); - ticks += end - start; + key[i][j] = (uint8_t) rte_rand(); } + start = rte_rdtsc(); + for (i = 0; i < HASHTEST_ITERATIONS; i++) + f(key[i], key_len, init_val); + end = rte_rdtsc(); + ticks = end - start; + printf("%-12s, %-18u, %-13u, %.02f\n", get_hash_name(f), (unsigned) key_len, (unsigned) init_val, (double)ticks / HASHTEST_ITERATIONS); }