From patchwork Wed Jun 3 23:10:23 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Ananyev, Konstantin" X-Patchwork-Id: 5119 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3FFC32E; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 01:10:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12E35A8B for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 01:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2015 16:10:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,549,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="704934629" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2015 16:10:28 -0700 Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (sivswdev02.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.46]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id t53NARiF006157; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 00:10:27 +0100 Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id t53NARpO005787; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 00:10:27 +0100 Received: (from kananye1@localhost) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with id t53NARf4005783; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 00:10:27 +0100 From: Konstantin Ananyev To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 00:10:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1433373024-5558-8-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.4.1 In-Reply-To: <1433373024-5558-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> References: <1433373024-5558-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/8] ACL: fix remove ambiguity between rules at UT X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Some test rules had equal priorityi for the same category. That can causes an ambiguity in build trie and test results. Specify different priority value for each rule from the same category. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev --- app/test/test_acl.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_acl.h b/app/test/test_acl.h index 4af457d..4e8ff34 100644 --- a/app/test/test_acl.h +++ b/app/test/test_acl.h @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets traveling to 192.168.0.0/16 */ { .data = {.userdata = 1, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 230}, .dst_addr = IPv4(192,168,0,0), .dst_mask_len = 16, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets traveling to 192.168.1.0/24 */ { .data = {.userdata = 2, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 330}, .dst_addr = IPv4(192,168,1,0), .dst_mask_len = 24, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets traveling to 192.168.1.50 */ { .data = {.userdata = 3, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 230}, .dst_addr = IPv4(192,168,1,50), .dst_mask_len = 32, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets traveling from 10.0.0.0/8 */ { .data = {.userdata = 4, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 240}, .src_addr = IPv4(10,0,0,0), .src_mask_len = 8, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets traveling from 10.1.1.0/24 */ { .data = {.userdata = 5, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 340}, .src_addr = IPv4(10,1,1,0), .src_mask_len = 24, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets traveling from 10.1.1.1 */ { .data = {.userdata = 6, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 240}, .src_addr = IPv4(10,1,1,1), .src_mask_len = 32, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with lower 7 bytes of VLAN tag equal to 0x64 */ { .data = {.userdata = 7, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 260}, .vlan = 0x64, .vlan_mask = 0x7f, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with VLAN tags that have 0x5 in them */ { .data = {.userdata = 8, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 260}, .vlan = 0x5, .vlan_mask = 0x5, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with VLAN tag 5 */ { .data = {.userdata = 9, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 360}, .vlan = 0x5, .vlan_mask = 0xffff, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with lower 7 bytes of domain equal to 0x64 */ { .data = {.userdata = 10, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 250}, .domain = 0x64, .domain_mask = 0x7f, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with domains that have 0x5 in them */ { .data = {.userdata = 11, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 350}, .domain = 0x5, .domain_mask = 0x5, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with domain 5 */ { .data = {.userdata = 12, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 350}, .domain = 0x5, .domain_mask = 0xffff, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with dst port 80 */ { .data = {.userdata = 13, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 310}, .dst_port_low = 80, .dst_port_high = 80, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with dst port 22-1023 */ { .data = {.userdata = 14, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 210}, .dst_port_low = 22, .dst_port_high = 1023, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with dst port 1020 */ { .data = {.userdata = 15, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 310}, .dst_port_low = 1020, .dst_port_high = 1020, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with dst portrange 1000-2000 */ { .data = {.userdata = 16, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 210}, .dst_port_low = 1000, .dst_port_high = 2000, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with src port 80 */ { .data = {.userdata = 17, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 320}, .src_port_low = 80, .src_port_high = 80, .dst_port_low = 0, @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with src port 22-1023 */ { .data = {.userdata = 18, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 220}, .src_port_low = 22, .src_port_high = 1023, .dst_port_low = 0, @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with src port 1020 */ { .data = {.userdata = 19, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 320}, .src_port_low = 1020, .src_port_high = 1020, .dst_port_low = 0, @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches everything with src portrange 1000-2000 */ { .data = {.userdata = 20, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 220}, .src_port_low = 1000, .src_port_high = 2000, .dst_port_low = 0, @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with protocol number either 0x64 or 0xE4 */ { .data = {.userdata = 21, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 2}, + .priority = 270}, .proto = 0x64, .proto_mask = 0x7f, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* matches all packets with protocol 5 */ { .data = {.userdata = 23, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 3}, + .priority = 370}, .proto = 0x5, .proto_mask = 0xff, .src_port_low = 0, @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { /* rules combining various fields */ { .data = {.userdata = 24, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 4}, + .priority = 400}, /** make sure that unmasked bytes don't fail! */ .dst_addr = IPv4(1,2,3,4), .dst_mask_len = 16, @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { }, { .data = {.userdata = 25, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 4}, + .priority = 400}, .dst_addr = IPv4(5,6,7,8), .dst_mask_len = 24, .src_addr = IPv4(1,2,3,4), @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { }, { .data = {.userdata = 26, .category_mask = ACL_ALLOW_MASK, - .priority = 5}, + .priority = 500}, .dst_addr = IPv4(1,2,3,4), .dst_mask_len = 8, .src_addr = IPv4(5,6,7,8), @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule acl_test_rules[] = { }, { .data = {.userdata = 27, .category_mask = ACL_DENY_MASK, - .priority = 5}, + .priority = 500}, .dst_addr = IPv4(5,6,7,8), .dst_mask_len = 32, .src_addr = IPv4(1,2,3,4),