[v3] net/gve: add support for TSO in DQO RDA
Checks
Commit Message
The patch intends on adding support for TSO in DQO RDA format.
Signed-off-by: Tathagat Priyadarshi <tathagat.dpdk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Varun Lakkur Ambaji Rao <varun.la@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 12:19 AM Tathagat Priyadarshi
<tathagat.dpdk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The patch intends on adding support for TSO in DQO RDA format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tathagat Priyadarshi <tathagat.dpdk@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Varun Lakkur Ambaji Rao <varun.la@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hi @Joshua Washington / @Rushil Gupta ,
Could you please review this patch?
Acked-by: Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com>
Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 11:49 AM Tathagat Priyadarshi
<tathagat.dpdk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The patch intends on adding support for TSO in DQO RDA format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tathagat Priyadarshi <tathagat.dpdk@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Varun Lakkur Ambaji Rao <varun.la@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c b/drivers/net/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c
> index b9d6d01..731c287 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,17 @@
> txq->complq_tail = next;
> }
>
I see that we are not populating the flex metadata here like the linux
driver. These metadata fields allow guest vm to send metadata to fxp.
However; that can be a separate change.
> +static inline void
> +gve_tx_fill_seg_desc_dqo(volatile union gve_tx_desc_dqo *desc, struct rte_mbuf *tx_pkt)
> +{
> + uint32_t hlen = tx_pkt->l2_len + tx_pkt->l3_len + tx_pkt->l4_len;
> + desc->tso_ctx.cmd_dtype.dtype = GVE_TX_TSO_CTX_DESC_DTYPE_DQO;
> + desc->tso_ctx.cmd_dtype.tso = 1;
> + desc->tso_ctx.mss = (uint16_t)tx_pkt->tso_segsz;
> + desc->tso_ctx.tso_total_len = tx_pkt->pkt_len - hlen;
> + desc->tso_ctx.header_len = (uint8_t)hlen;
> +}
> +
> uint16_t
> gve_tx_burst_dqo(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> {
> @@ -89,6 +100,7 @@
> uint16_t sw_id;
> uint64_t bytes;
> uint16_t first_sw_id;
> + uint8_t tso;
> uint8_t csum;
>
> sw_ring = txq->sw_ring;
> @@ -109,15 +121,23 @@
> gve_tx_clean_dqo(txq);
> }
>
> - if (txq->nb_free < tx_pkt->nb_segs)
> - break;
> -
> ol_flags = tx_pkt->ol_flags;
> nb_used = tx_pkt->nb_segs;
> first_sw_id = sw_id;
>
> + tso = !!(ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_SEG);
> csum = !!(ol_flags & GVE_TX_CKSUM_OFFLOAD_MASK_DQO);
>
> + nb_used += tso;
> + if (txq->nb_free < nb_used)
> + break;
> +
> + if (tso) {
> + txd = &txr[tx_id];
> + gve_tx_fill_seg_desc_dqo(txd, tx_pkt);
> + tx_id = (tx_id + 1) & mask;
> + }
> +
> do {
> if (sw_ring[sw_id] != NULL)
> PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Overwriting an entry in sw_ring");
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
On 8/27/2024 4:11 AM, Rushil Gupta wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 11:49 AM Tathagat Priyadarshi
> <tathagat.dpdk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The patch intends on adding support for TSO in DQO RDA format.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tathagat Priyadarshi <tathagat.dpdk@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Varun Lakkur Ambaji Rao <varun.la@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com>
>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
@@ -72,6 +72,17 @@
txq->complq_tail = next;
}
+static inline void
+gve_tx_fill_seg_desc_dqo(volatile union gve_tx_desc_dqo *desc, struct rte_mbuf *tx_pkt)
+{
+ uint32_t hlen = tx_pkt->l2_len + tx_pkt->l3_len + tx_pkt->l4_len;
+ desc->tso_ctx.cmd_dtype.dtype = GVE_TX_TSO_CTX_DESC_DTYPE_DQO;
+ desc->tso_ctx.cmd_dtype.tso = 1;
+ desc->tso_ctx.mss = (uint16_t)tx_pkt->tso_segsz;
+ desc->tso_ctx.tso_total_len = tx_pkt->pkt_len - hlen;
+ desc->tso_ctx.header_len = (uint8_t)hlen;
+}
+
uint16_t
gve_tx_burst_dqo(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
{
@@ -89,6 +100,7 @@
uint16_t sw_id;
uint64_t bytes;
uint16_t first_sw_id;
+ uint8_t tso;
uint8_t csum;
sw_ring = txq->sw_ring;
@@ -109,15 +121,23 @@
gve_tx_clean_dqo(txq);
}
- if (txq->nb_free < tx_pkt->nb_segs)
- break;
-
ol_flags = tx_pkt->ol_flags;
nb_used = tx_pkt->nb_segs;
first_sw_id = sw_id;
+ tso = !!(ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_SEG);
csum = !!(ol_flags & GVE_TX_CKSUM_OFFLOAD_MASK_DQO);
+ nb_used += tso;
+ if (txq->nb_free < nb_used)
+ break;
+
+ if (tso) {
+ txd = &txr[tx_id];
+ gve_tx_fill_seg_desc_dqo(txd, tx_pkt);
+ tx_id = (tx_id + 1) & mask;
+ }
+
do {
if (sw_ring[sw_id] != NULL)
PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Overwriting an entry in sw_ring");