Message ID | 20181129071608.20820-1-yahui.cao@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Delegated to: | Thomas Monjalon |
Headers | show |
Series | bus/vdev: add warning for duplicated vdev name | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
ci/checkpatch | success | coding style OK |
ci/Intel-compilation | success | Compilation OK |
ci/mellanox-Performance-Testing | success | Performance Testing PASS |
ci/intel-Performance-Testing | success | Performance Testing PASS |
29/11/2018 08:16, Yahui Cao: > If duplicated vdev name is detected, print out a warning message. > > Signed-off-by: Yahui Cao <yahui.cao@intel.com> > --- > drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > index 9c66bdc78..ff2db7d3f 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > @@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ vdev_scan(void) > if (find_vdev(devargs->name)) { > rte_spinlock_recursive_unlock(&vdev_device_list_lock); > free(dev); > + VDEV_LOG(WARNING, "duplicated vdev name %s detected!", > + devargs->name); > continue; > } I'm surprised there is nothing to prevent from creating 2 vdevs with the same name. It should be considered as an error and reject the vdev creation.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 29/11/2018 08:16, Yahui Cao: > > If duplicated vdev name is detected, print out a warning message. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yahui Cao <yahui.cao@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > > index 9c66bdc78..ff2db7d3f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > > @@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ vdev_scan(void) > > if (find_vdev(devargs->name)) { > > rte_spinlock_recursive_unlock(&vdev_device_list_lock); > > free(dev); > > + VDEV_LOG(WARNING, "duplicated vdev name %s detected!", > > + devargs->name); > > continue; > > } > > I'm surprised there is nothing to prevent from creating 2 vdevs > with the same name. It should be considered as an error > and reject the vdev creation. > > Actually it does skip the creation of vdev with the same name. Is it enough to return error from vdev_scan(), or even return error from rte_bus_scan()? Please give some advice.
diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c index 9c66bdc78..ff2db7d3f 100644 --- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c +++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c @@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ vdev_scan(void) if (find_vdev(devargs->name)) { rte_spinlock_recursive_unlock(&vdev_device_list_lock); free(dev); + VDEV_LOG(WARNING, "duplicated vdev name %s detected!", + devargs->name); continue; }
If duplicated vdev name is detected, print out a warning message. Signed-off-by: Yahui Cao <yahui.cao@intel.com> --- drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)