[v2,4/7] test/rcu: use size_t instead of int
Checks
Commit Message
Variables used to store the return value of rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize
in variables of type 'int'. The variables are of type 'size_t' now.
Fixes: b87089b0bb19 ("test/rcu: add API and functional tests")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
---
app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c | 4 ++--
app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c | 11 ++++++-----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Comments
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:12 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
<honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Variables used to store the return value of rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize
> in variables of type 'int'. The variables are of type 'size_t' now.
Added a comment on the two cases we have here: the uint32_t storage
are fine while the int ones were an issue.
>
> Fixes: b87089b0bb19 ("test/rcu: add API and functional tests")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c | 4 ++--
> app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> index d1b9e46a2..2f71ec6ad 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int
> alloc_rcu(void)
> {
> int i;
> - uint32_t sz;
> + size_t sz;
>
> sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(RTE_MAX_LCORE);
>
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ free_rcu(void)
> static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(void)
> {
> - uint32_t sz;
> + size_t sz;
>
> printf("\nTest rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register()\n");
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> index cb2d177b7..280f1811f 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_writer_perf(void *arg)
> static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void)
> {
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i, tmp_num_cores;
>
> writer_done = 0;
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void)
> static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void)
> {
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i, tmp_num_cores;
>
> rte_atomic64_clear(&updates);
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void)
> static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_wperf(void)
> {
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i;
>
> rte_atomic64_clear(&checks);
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs(void)
> {
> uint64_t token, begin, cycles;
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i, j, tmp_num_cores;
> int32_t pos;
>
> @@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs_non_blocking(void)
> {
> uint64_t token, begin, cycles;
> - int ret, sz;
> + int ret;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i, j, tmp_num_cores;
> int32_t pos;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
David Marchand
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int
alloc_rcu(void)
{
int i;
- uint32_t sz;
+ size_t sz;
sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(RTE_MAX_LCORE);
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ free_rcu(void)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(void)
{
- uint32_t sz;
+ size_t sz;
printf("\nTest rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register()\n");
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_writer_perf(void *arg)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void)
{
- int sz;
+ size_t sz;
unsigned int i, tmp_num_cores;
writer_done = 0;
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void)
{
- int sz;
+ size_t sz;
unsigned int i, tmp_num_cores;
rte_atomic64_clear(&updates);
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_wperf(void)
{
- int sz;
+ size_t sz;
unsigned int i;
rte_atomic64_clear(&checks);
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int
test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs(void)
{
uint64_t token, begin, cycles;
- int sz;
+ size_t sz;
unsigned int i, j, tmp_num_cores;
int32_t pos;
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ static int
test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs_non_blocking(void)
{
uint64_t token, begin, cycles;
- int ret, sz;
+ int ret;
+ size_t sz;
unsigned int i, j, tmp_num_cores;
int32_t pos;