From patchwork Fri Apr 8 05:38:11 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wenjun Wu X-Patchwork-Id: 109465 X-Patchwork-Delegate: qi.z.zhang@intel.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902DCA0513; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 07:59:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A11C42868; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 07:59:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD1B4067E for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 07:59:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1649397563; x=1680933563; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uum2pRlzio5gsVpOhps/eoKTw3EdL0ghijuFA1MBGM4=; b=asHDGhfsr5rXiCJJExQGbBHKIUUQ+8GLfcdF2a1wERX7xJ0Jxroyb5m2 8tBCUOenHwXNIgWWKFrvrvT4Ak3DT7NbxANSl3DM7d+cIaFu2nI05T6Tw AKNc0lmW4mj96jf6zY2qLFPxZPOPWoE/nUo1uc3/NBB3dbfvN+VtPS6vT qMv5vS7af5c/uZkNJUrBLlQuLQyW7RKX++hHfmrxdDvdRGDH4IGgkeAke QSW439TTcAFPTYwO9gpBDZ6+Zoa6wC9sTrWajKMggx5LdujR5libek1/m 7OTjQYqd3stc4gR4u/n0KdnPVMQ2jFYIFmkjAASqXS83p1AcTb2RyGcnH g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10310"; a="241450469" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,244,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="241450469" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Apr 2022 22:59:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,244,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="642773600" Received: from npg-wuwenjun-dpdk-01.sh.intel.com ([10.67.110.181]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2022 22:59:20 -0700 From: Wenjun Wu To: dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, qiming.yang@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v6 06/10] net/ice: support queue priority configuration Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:38:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20220408053815.850191-7-wenjun1.wu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220408053815.850191-1-wenjun1.wu@intel.com> References: <20220329014813.1092054-1-wenjun1.wu@intel.com> <20220408053815.850191-1-wenjun1.wu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org This patch adds queue priority configuration support. The highest priority is 0, and the lowest priority is 7. Signed-off-by: Wenjun Wu --- drivers/net/ice/ice_tm.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_tm.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_tm.c index d70d077286..91e420d653 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_tm.c +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_tm.c @@ -147,9 +147,9 @@ ice_node_param_check(struct ice_pf *pf, uint32_t node_id, return -EINVAL; } - if (priority) { + if (priority >= 8) { error->type = RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_NODE_PRIORITY; - error->message = "priority should be 0"; + error->message = "priority should be less than 8"; return -EINVAL; } @@ -684,6 +684,7 @@ static int ice_hierarchy_commit(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct ice_vsi *vsi; int ret_val = ICE_SUCCESS; uint64_t peak = 0; + uint8_t priority; uint32_t i; uint32_t idx_vsi_child; uint32_t idx_qg; @@ -779,6 +780,7 @@ static int ice_hierarchy_commit(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, qid = tm_node->id; txq = dev->data->tx_queues[qid]; vsi = txq->vsi; + q_teid = txq->q_teid; if (tm_node->shaper_profile) { /* Transfer from Byte per seconds to Kbps */ peak = tm_node->shaper_profile->profile.peak.rate; @@ -794,6 +796,14 @@ static int ice_hierarchy_commit(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, goto fail_clear; } } + priority = 7 - tm_node->priority; + ret_val = ice_cfg_vsi_q_priority(hw->port_info, 1, + &q_teid, &priority); + if (ret_val) { + error->type = RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_NODE_PRIORITY; + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "configure queue %u priority failed", tm_node->priority); + goto fail_clear; + } } return ret_val;