[v2,1/6] app/procinfo: add version dump

Message ID 20220920105148.7664-2-liudongdong3@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers
Series app/procinfo: add some extended features |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Dongdong Liu Sept. 20, 2022, 10:51 a.m. UTC
  From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>

This patch add support for dump dpdk version and ethdev firmware version.

The command is like:
dpdk-proc-info -a xxxx:xx:xx.x --file-prefix=xxx -- --show-version

Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
---
 app/proc-info/main.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Stephen Hemminger Sept. 20, 2022, 3:21 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:51:42 +0800
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
> 
> This patch add support for dump dpdk version and ethdev firmware version.
> 
> The command is like:
> dpdk-proc-info -a xxxx:xx:xx.x --file-prefix=xxx -- --show-version
> 
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
> ---

Why mix DPDK and firmware version in one option?

Why not use semi-standard convention of -V --version option for DPDK version
and add --firmware-version option to show firmware.
  
Dongdong Liu Sept. 21, 2022, 11:11 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Stephen

Many thanks for your review.
On 2022/9/20 23:21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:51:42 +0800
> Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
>>
>> This patch add support for dump dpdk version and ethdev firmware version.
>>
>> The command is like:
>> dpdk-proc-info -a xxxx:xx:xx.x --file-prefix=xxx -- --show-version
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
>> ---
>
> Why mix DPDK and firmware version in one option?
Like ethtool -i command, one command can show kernel version
and ethdev firmware version.

ethtool -i eth0
driver: hns3
version: 5.13.0-rc4+
firmware-version: 1.20.0.17

>
> Why not use semi-standard convention of -V --version option for DPDK version
> and add --firmware-version option to show firmware.
Looks good, will do.

Thanks,
Dongdong
> .
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/app/proc-info/main.c b/app/proc-info/main.c
index 1bfba5f60d..da67155007 100644
--- a/app/proc-info/main.c
+++ b/app/proc-info/main.c
@@ -39,11 +39,14 @@ 
 #include <rte_cryptodev.h>
 #include <rte_tm.h>
 #include <rte_hexdump.h>
+#include <rte_version.h>
 
 /* Maximum long option length for option parsing. */
 #define MAX_LONG_OPT_SZ 64
 #define MAX_STRING_LEN 256
 
+#define ETHDEV_FWVERS_LEN 32
+
 #define STATS_BDR_FMT "========================================"
 #define STATS_BDR_STR(w, s) printf("%.*s%s%.*s\n", w, \
 	STATS_BDR_FMT, s, w, STATS_BDR_FMT)
@@ -102,6 +105,8 @@  static char *mempool_iter_name;
 /**< Enable dump regs. */
 static uint32_t enable_dump_regs;
 static char *dump_regs_file_prefix;
+/* Enable show version. */
+static uint32_t enable_shw_version;
 
 /**< display usage */
 static void
@@ -130,6 +135,7 @@  proc_info_usage(const char *prgname)
 		"  --show-crypto: to display crypto information\n"
 		"  --show-ring[=name]: to display ring information\n"
 		"  --show-mempool[=name]: to display mempool information\n"
+		"  --show-version: to display DPDK version and ethdev firmware version\n"
 		"  --iter-mempool=name: iterate mempool elements to display content\n"
 		"  --dump-regs=file-prefix: dump registers to file with the file-prefix\n",
 		prgname);
@@ -242,6 +248,7 @@  proc_info_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
 		{"show-mempool", optional_argument, NULL, 0},
 		{"iter-mempool", required_argument, NULL, 0},
 		{"dump-regs", required_argument, NULL, 0},
+		{"show-version", 0, NULL, 0},
 		{NULL, 0, 0, 0}
 	};
 
@@ -313,7 +320,9 @@  proc_info_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
 					"dump-regs", MAX_LONG_OPT_SZ)) {
 				enable_dump_regs = 1;
 				dump_regs_file_prefix = optarg;
-			}
+			} else if (!strncmp(long_option[option_index].name,
+					"show-version", MAX_LONG_OPT_SZ))
+				enable_shw_version = 1;
 			break;
 		case 1:
 			/* Print xstat single value given by name*/
@@ -1476,6 +1485,32 @@  dump_regs(char *file_prefix)
 	}
 }
 
+static void
+show_version(void)
+{
+	char fw_version[ETHDEV_FWVERS_LEN];
+	uint16_t i;
+
+	snprintf(bdr_str, MAX_STRING_LEN, " show - version ");
+	STATS_BDR_STR(10, bdr_str);
+	printf("DPDK version: %s\n", rte_version());
+
+	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i) {
+		/* Skip if port is not in mask */
+		if ((enabled_port_mask & (1ul << i)) == 0)
+			continue;
+
+		if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(i))
+			continue;
+
+		if (rte_eth_dev_fw_version_get(i, fw_version,
+						ETHDEV_FWVERS_LEN) == 0)
+			printf("Ethdev port %u firmware version: %s\n", i, fw_version);
+		else
+			printf("Ethdev port %u firmware version: %s\n", i, "not available");
+	}
+}
+
 int
 main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
@@ -1589,7 +1624,8 @@  main(int argc, char **argv)
 		iter_mempool(mempool_iter_name);
 	if (enable_dump_regs)
 		dump_regs(dump_regs_file_prefix);
-
+	if (enable_shw_version)
+		show_version();
 	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i)
 		rte_eth_dev_close(i);