[V1,1/2] tests/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum value of switch rule
Commit Message
confirm with developer that CVL support up to 32K FLU entries.Firmware allocates some
default entries first, the actual entries can't be calculated and depend on hardware.
there is no formula to figure out the specific rule numbers of different environment
configurations,so can't acquire the actual number of free entries.
dts case needs to modify the maximum value of switch rule to a proper value
Signed-off-by: Qin Sun <qinx.sun@intel.com>
---
tests/TestSuite_cvl_limit_value_test.py | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Comments
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sun, QinX <qinx.sun@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 9:50 PM
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Sun, QinX <qinx.sun@intel.com>
> Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1 1/2] tests/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum value of switch rule
Tested-by: Qin Sun <qinx.sun@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dts <dts-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Sun, QinX
> Sent: 2021年7月29日 13:28
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1 1/2] tests/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum
> value of switch rule
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sun, QinX <qinx.sun@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 9:50 PM
> > To: dts@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Sun, QinX <qinx.sun@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1 1/2] tests/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum
> value of switch rule
>
> Tested-by: Qin Sun <qinx.sun@intel.com>
Applied, thanks
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ tv_max_rule_number = {
"matched": {"scapy_str": [],
"check_func": {"func": rfc.check_vf_rx_packets_number,
"param": {"expect_port": 1}},
- "expect_results": {"expect_pkts": 32563}},
+ "expect_results": {"expect_pkts": 32500}},
"mismatched": {
"scapy_str": ['Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.167.0.1")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)'],
"check_func": {"func": rfc.check_vf_rx_packets_number,
@@ -908,13 +908,13 @@ class TestCvlLimitValue(TestCase):
# set up 4 vfs on 1 pf environment
self.setup_1pf_vfs_env()
- # create 32563 rules with the same pattern, but different input set to file
+ # create 32500 rules with the same pattern, but different input set to file
src_file = 'dep/testpmd_cmds_32k_switch_rules'
flows = open(src_file, mode='w')
rule_count = 1
for i in range(0, 255):
for j in range(0, 255):
- if not rule_count > 32563:
+ if not rule_count > 32500:
flows.write(
'flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.%d.%d / end actions vf id 1 / end \n' % (
i, j))
@@ -924,12 +924,12 @@ class TestCvlLimitValue(TestCase):
rule_count += 1
else:
break
- if rule_count > 32563:
+ if rule_count > 32500:
break
flows.close()
dut_file_dir = '/tmp/'
self.dut.session.copy_file_to(src_file, dut_file_dir)
- # launch testpmd with 32563 rules
+ # launch testpmd with 32500 rules
vf0_pci = self.sriov_vfs_port_0[0].pci
vf1_pci = self.sriov_vfs_port_0[1].pci
all_eal_param = self.dut.create_eal_parameters(cores="1S/4C/1T", ports=[vf0_pci, vf1_pci],
@@ -939,8 +939,8 @@ class TestCvlLimitValue(TestCase):
self.testpmd_status = "running"
self.dut.send_expect("set portlist 1", "testpmd> ", 15)
self.dut.send_expect("set fwd rxonly", "testpmd> ", 15)
- # check the rule list with 32563 rules
- rule_list_num = list(range(0, 32563))
+ # check the rule list with 32500 rules
+ rule_list_num = list(range(0, 32500))
rule_list = [str(x) for x in rule_list_num]
self.check_switch_filter_rule_list(0, rule_list)
# create other rules to make switch filter table full