diff mbox

[dpdk-dev] vhost: remove a hack on queue allocation

Message ID 20170401083258.GW18844@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Yuanhan Liu
Headers

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch warning coding style issues
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Yuanhan Liu April 1, 2017, 8:32 a.m. UTC 
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:56:12PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:41:07AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 03/02/2017 07:16 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > >We used to allocate queues based on the index from SET_VRING_CALL
> > >request: if corresponding queue hasn't been allocated, allocate it.
> > >
> > >Though it's pratically right (it's the first per-vring request we
> > >will get from QEMU for vhost-user negotiation), but it's not technically
> > >right: it's not documented in the vhost-user spec that it will always
> > >be the first per-vring request. For example, SET_VRING_ADDR could also
> > >be the first per-vring request.
> > >
> > >Thus, we should not depend the SET_VRING_CALL on queue allocation.
> > >Instead, we could catch all the per-vring messages at the entrance of
> > >request handler, and allocate one if it hasn't been allocated before.
> > >
> > >By that, we could remove a hack.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > >---
> > >
> > >v2: add missing break
> > >---
> > > lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Applied to dpdk-next-virtio.

Reworked, as there is a silly error that cause crash.

	--yliu

-- >8 --
From 269ba9b3a6a1671f463b9f9d4cc0d51954f7a2f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:16:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v3] vhost: remove a hack on queue allocation

We used to allocate queues based on the index from SET_VRING_CALL
request: if corresponding queue hasn't been allocated, allocate it.

Though it's pratically right (it's the first per-vring request we
will get from QEMU for vhost-user negotiation), but it's not technically
right: it's not documented in the vhost-user spec that it will always
be the first per-vring request. For example, SET_VRING_ADDR could also
be the first per-vring request.

Thus, we should not depend the SET_VRING_CALL on queue allocation.
Instead, we could catch all the per-vring messages at the entrance of
request handler, and allocate one if it hasn't been allocated before.

By that, we could remove a hack.

Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
---

v3: fix the virtuqueue check that introduces crash in MQ
---
 lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Yuanhan Liu April 1, 2017, 8:35 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 04:32:58PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:56:12PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:41:07AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 03/02/2017 07:16 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > >We used to allocate queues based on the index from SET_VRING_CALL
> > > >request: if corresponding queue hasn't been allocated, allocate it.
> > > >
> > > >Though it's pratically right (it's the first per-vring request we
> > > >will get from QEMU for vhost-user negotiation), but it's not technically
> > > >right: it's not documented in the vhost-user spec that it will always
> > > >be the first per-vring request. For example, SET_VRING_ADDR could also
> > > >be the first per-vring request.
> > > >
> > > >Thus, we should not depend the SET_VRING_CALL on queue allocation.
> > > >Instead, we could catch all the per-vring messages at the entrance of
> > > >request handler, and allocate one if it hasn't been allocated before.
> > > >
> > > >By that, we could remove a hack.
> > > >
> > > >Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > > >---
> > > >
> > > >v2: add missing break
> > > >---
> > > > lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Applied to dpdk-next-virtio.
> 
> Reworked, as there is a silly error that cause crash.

Re-applied.

	--yliu

> -- >8 --
> >From 269ba9b3a6a1671f463b9f9d4cc0d51954f7a2f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:16:07 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH v3] vhost: remove a hack on queue allocation
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
index cb2156a..2767cca 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
@@ -635,7 +635,6 @@ 
 {
 	struct vhost_vring_file file;
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
-	uint32_t cur_qp_idx;
 
 	file.index = pmsg->payload.u64 & VHOST_USER_VRING_IDX_MASK;
 	if (pmsg->payload.u64 & VHOST_USER_VRING_NOFD_MASK)
@@ -645,19 +644,7 @@ 
 	RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG,
 		"vring call idx:%d file:%d\n", file.index, file.fd);
 
-	/*
-	 * FIXME: VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL is the first per-vring message
-	 * we get, so we do vring queue pair allocation here.
-	 */
-	cur_qp_idx = file.index / VIRTIO_QNUM;
-	if (cur_qp_idx + 1 > dev->virt_qp_nb) {
-		if (alloc_vring_queue_pair(dev, cur_qp_idx) < 0)
-			return;
-	}
-
 	vq = dev->virtqueue[file.index];
-	assert(vq != NULL);
-
 	if (vq->callfd >= 0)
 		close(vq->callfd);
 
@@ -914,6 +901,46 @@ 
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Allocate a queue pair if it hasn't been allocated yet
+ */
+static int
+vhost_user_check_and_alloc_queue_pair(struct virtio_net *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg)
+{
+	uint16_t vring_idx;
+	uint16_t qp_idx;
+
+	switch (msg->request) {
+	case VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_KICK:
+	case VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_CALL:
+	case VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ERR:
+		vring_idx = msg->payload.u64 & VHOST_USER_VRING_IDX_MASK;
+		break;
+	case VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_NUM:
+	case VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_BASE:
+	case VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE:
+		vring_idx = msg->payload.state.index;
+		break;
+	case VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ADDR:
+		vring_idx = msg->payload.addr.index;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	qp_idx = vring_idx / VIRTIO_QNUM;
+	if (qp_idx >= VHOST_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
+			"invalid vring index: %u\n", vring_idx);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (dev->virtqueue[qp_idx * VIRTIO_QNUM])
+		return 0;
+
+	return alloc_vring_queue_pair(dev, qp_idx);
+}
+
 int
 vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
 {
@@ -943,6 +970,14 @@ 
 	ret = 0;
 	RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG, "read message %s\n",
 		vhost_message_str[msg.request]);
+
+	ret = vhost_user_check_and_alloc_queue_pair(dev, &msg);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
+			"failed to alloc queue\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	switch (msg.request) {
 	case VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES:
 		msg.payload.u64 = vhost_user_get_features();