| Message ID | 20211202092001.1830481-2-zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | Qi Zhang |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/2] net/ixgbe: add vector Rx parameter check | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ci/iol-x86_64-compile-testing | success | Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-x86_64-unit-testing | success | Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-aarch64-compile-testing | success | Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-aarch64-unit-testing | success | Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-intel-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-intel-Functional | success | Functional Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-broadcom-Functional | success | Functional Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-mellanox-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-broadcom-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
| ci/github-robot: build | success | github build: passed |
| ci/intel-Testing | success | Testing PASS |
| ci/Intel-compilation | success | Compilation OK |
| ci/checkpatch | success | coding style OK |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 17:20 > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; liangma@liangbit.com; Bin Zheng > <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com> > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] net/ixgbe: fix spelling mistakes > > fix comment spelling mistakes > > Signed-off-by: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com> > --- > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c > index 5811749b95..4654d0adec 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c > @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, > * Under the circumstance that `rx_tail` wrap back to zero > * and the advance speed of `rx_tail` is greater than `rxrearm_start`, > * `rx_tail` will catch up with `rxrearm_start` and surpass it. > - * This may cause some mbufs be reused by applicaion. > + * This may cause some mbufs be reused by application. This is your patch 1's, just submit the 1 & 2 by one patch. > * > * So we need to make some restrictions to ensure that > * `rx_tail` will not exceed `rxrearm_start`. > -- > 2.25.1
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c index 5811749b95..4654d0adec 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, * Under the circumstance that `rx_tail` wrap back to zero * and the advance speed of `rx_tail` is greater than `rxrearm_start`, * `rx_tail` will catch up with `rxrearm_start` and surpass it. - * This may cause some mbufs be reused by applicaion. + * This may cause some mbufs be reused by application. * * So we need to make some restrictions to ensure that * `rx_tail` will not exceed `rxrearm_start`.
fix comment spelling mistakes Signed-off-by: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com> --- drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)