diff mbox series

[v2,2/2] net/ixgbe: fix spelling mistakes

Message ID 20211202092001.1830481-2-zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Qi Zhang
Headers show
Series [v2,1/2] net/ixgbe: add vector Rx parameter check | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/iol-x86_64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Bin Zheng Dec. 2, 2021, 9:20 a.m. UTC
fix comment spelling mistakes

Signed-off-by: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com>
---
 drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Wang, Haiyue Dec. 2, 2021, 12:53 p.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 17:20
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; liangma@liangbit.com; Bin Zheng
> <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] net/ixgbe: fix spelling mistakes
> 
> fix comment spelling mistakes
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89740@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c
> index 5811749b95..4654d0adec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  	 * Under the circumstance that `rx_tail` wrap back to zero
>  	 * and the advance speed of `rx_tail` is greater than `rxrearm_start`,
>  	 * `rx_tail` will catch up with `rxrearm_start` and surpass it.
> -	 * This may cause some mbufs be reused by applicaion.
> +	 * This may cause some mbufs be reused by application.

This is your patch 1's, just submit the 1 & 2 by one patch.

>  	 *
>  	 * So we need to make some restrictions to ensure that
>  	 * `rx_tail` will not exceed `rxrearm_start`.
> --
> 2.25.1
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c
index 5811749b95..4654d0adec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@  _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 	 * Under the circumstance that `rx_tail` wrap back to zero
 	 * and the advance speed of `rx_tail` is greater than `rxrearm_start`,
 	 * `rx_tail` will catch up with `rxrearm_start` and surpass it.
-	 * This may cause some mbufs be reused by applicaion.
+	 * This may cause some mbufs be reused by application.
 	 *
 	 * So we need to make some restrictions to ensure that
 	 * `rx_tail` will not exceed `rxrearm_start`.