diff mbox series

[V1,2/2] test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum value of switch rule

Message ID 20210729135116.4575-1-qinx.sun@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [V1,1/2] tests/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum value of switch rule | expand

Commit Message

Sun, QinX July 29, 2021, 1:51 p.m. UTC
confirm with developer that CVL support up to 32K FLU entries. Firmware allocates 
some default entries first, the actual entries can't be calculated and depend on 
hardware. there is no formula to figure out the specific rule numbers of different
environment configurations,so can't acquire the actual number of free entries.
dts case needs to modify the maximum value of switch rule to a proper value


Signed-off-by: Qin Sun <qinx.sun@intel.com>
---
 test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test_test_plan.rst | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Sun, QinX July 29, 2021, 5:28 a.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sun, QinX <qinx.sun@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 9:51 PM
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Sun, QinX <qinx.sun@intel.com>
> Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1 2/2] test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum value of switch rule

Tested-by: Qin Sun <qinx.sun@intel.com>
Peng Yuan Aug. 6, 2021, 8:50 a.m. UTC | #2
Acked-by Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: dts <dts-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Sun, QinX
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 1:28 PM
To: dts@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1 2/2] test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test: modify maximum value of switch rule
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test_test_plan.rst
index 9cb0cf09..9fec36f2 100644
--- a/test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test_test_plan.rst
+++ b/test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test_test_plan.rst
@@ -556,14 +556,14 @@  Description: 32k switch filter rules can be created on a CVL card,
 and all PFs and VFs share the 32k rules. But the system will first create
 some MAC_VLAN rules in switch table, and as the number of rules increased,
 the hash conflicts in the switch filter table are increased, so we can
-create a total of 32563 switch filter rules on a DCF.
+create a total of 32500 switch filter rules on a DCF.
 
-1. create 32563 rules with the same pattern, but different input set::
+1. create 32500 rules with the same pattern, but different input set::
 
      testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.0 / end actions vf id 1 / end
      testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 / end actions vf id 1 / end
      ......
-     testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.127.177 / end actions vf id 1 / end
+     testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.127.114 / end actions vf id 1 / end
      testpmd> flow list 0
 
    check the rules exist in the list.
@@ -584,14 +584,14 @@  create a total of 32563 switch filter rules on a DCF.
 
    check the rule in step 2 not exists in the list.
 
-4. send 32563 matched packets for rule 0-32562::
+4. send 32500 matched packets for rule 0-32499::
 
      sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.0")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="ens786f0", count=1)
      sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="ens786f0", count=1)
      ......
-     sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.127.177")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="ens786f0", count=1)
+     sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.127.114")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="ens786f0", count=1)
 
-   check port 1 receive the 32563 packets.
+   check port 1 receive the 32500 packets.
    send 1 mismatched packet::
 
      sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.167.0.1")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="ens786f0", count=1)
@@ -604,4 +604,4 @@  create a total of 32563 switch filter rules on a DCF.
      testpmd> flow list 0
 
    check the rules not exist in the list.
-   send 32563 matched packets, check the packets are not to port 1.
+   send 32500 matched packets, check the packets are not to port 1.