[dpdk-dev,v4,5/8] sample/vhost:remove ip_hdr structure defination
Commit Message
Remove the ip_hdr structure defination.
Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
---
examples/vhost/main.c | 15 +--------------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:40:43PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> Remove the ip_hdr structure defination.
Even for such simple patch, you need state why. Stating that
"remove ip_hdr structure defination because we already have
that in rte_ip.h" will definitely let others to accept your
patch eaiser.
--yliu
>
> Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/vhost/main.c | 15 +--------------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/vhost/main.c b/examples/vhost/main.c
> index c081b18..044c680 100644
> --- a/examples/vhost/main.c
> +++ b/examples/vhost/main.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> #include <rte_string_fns.h>
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
> #include <rte_virtio_net.h>
> +#include <rte_ip.h>
>
> #include "main.h"
>
> @@ -292,20 +293,6 @@ struct vlan_ethhdr {
> __be16 h_vlan_encapsulated_proto;
> };
>
> -/* IPv4 Header */
> -struct ipv4_hdr {
> - uint8_t version_ihl; /**< version and header length */
> - uint8_t type_of_service; /**< type of service */
> - uint16_t total_length; /**< length of packet */
> - uint16_t packet_id; /**< packet ID */
> - uint16_t fragment_offset; /**< fragmentation offset */
> - uint8_t time_to_live; /**< time to live */
> - uint8_t next_proto_id; /**< protocol ID */
> - uint16_t hdr_checksum; /**< header checksum */
> - uint32_t src_addr; /**< source address */
> - uint32_t dst_addr; /**< destination address */
> -} __attribute__((__packed__));
> -
> /* Header lengths. */
> #define VLAN_HLEN 4
> #define VLAN_ETH_HLEN 18
> --
> 1.7.7.6
2015-11-11 16:34, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:40:43PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> > Remove the ip_hdr structure defination.
>
> Even for such simple patch, you need state why. Stating that
> "remove ip_hdr structure defination because we already have
> that in rte_ip.h" will definitely let others to accept your
> patch eaiser.
Yes, thanks Yuanhan.
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
#include <rte_string_fns.h>
#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include <rte_virtio_net.h>
+#include <rte_ip.h>
#include "main.h"
@@ -292,20 +293,6 @@ struct vlan_ethhdr {
__be16 h_vlan_encapsulated_proto;
};
-/* IPv4 Header */
-struct ipv4_hdr {
- uint8_t version_ihl; /**< version and header length */
- uint8_t type_of_service; /**< type of service */
- uint16_t total_length; /**< length of packet */
- uint16_t packet_id; /**< packet ID */
- uint16_t fragment_offset; /**< fragmentation offset */
- uint8_t time_to_live; /**< time to live */
- uint8_t next_proto_id; /**< protocol ID */
- uint16_t hdr_checksum; /**< header checksum */
- uint32_t src_addr; /**< source address */
- uint32_t dst_addr; /**< destination address */
-} __attribute__((__packed__));
-
/* Header lengths. */
#define VLAN_HLEN 4
#define VLAN_ETH_HLEN 18