[TEST] dpdk/app/test/test_mbuf.c test_refcnt_mbuf instability + fix proposal
Checks
Commit Message
Hello,
from my understanding after debugging, in test_refcnt_iter the return value of rte_ring_enqueue is not checked; leading to lack of expected mbufs at the end checks.
Here is some fix proposal that seems to work after running endurance tests for several days:
Can you confirm ?
Thank,
Julien Hascoet
Comments
Hello Julien,
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 8:19 AM Julien Hascoet <jhascoet@kalrayinc.com> wrote:
> from my understanding after debugging, in test_refcnt_iter the return value of rte_ring_enqueue is not checked; leading to lack of expected mbufs at the end checks.
>
> Here is some fix proposal that seems to work after running endurance tests for several days:
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
> index b4f436b5e2..8a5d26e4f6 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
> @@ -1033,12 +1033,17 @@ test_refcnt_iter(unsigned int lcore, unsigned int iter,
> tref += ref;
> if ((ref & 1) != 0) {
> rte_pktmbuf_refcnt_update(m, ref);
> - while (ref-- != 0)
> - rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m);
> + while (ref-- != 0) {
> + /* retry in case of failure */
> + while (rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m) != 0)
> + ;
> + }
> } else {
> while (ref-- != 0) {
> rte_pktmbuf_refcnt_update(m, 1);
> - rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m);
> + /* retry in case of failure */
> + while (rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m) != 0)
> + ;
> }
> }
> rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
>
> Can you confirm ?
This analysis looks correct (though failing to enqueue in this unit
test seems strange to me).
Could you send a fix with a Fixes: line in the commitlog, and copying
the maintainer?
Thanks.
Here is a patch, I let you amend it if needed as I'm a beginner in the dpdk project
Thanks
Hello Julien,
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 10:02 AM Julien Hascoet <jhascoet@kalrayinc.com> wrote:
>
> Here is a patch, I let you amend it if needed as I'm a beginner in the dpdk project
There are a few issues with the way you sent it.
This patch was sent as an attachment while the patch content should be
sent inline.
It is also missing a Signed-off-by (see Developer's Certificate of Origin).
The better is for you to read the contributing guide
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html with a focus on
8.5, 8.8 and 8.12 sections.
Thanks.
@@ -1033,12 +1033,17 @@ test_refcnt_iter(unsigned int lcore, unsigned int iter,
tref += ref;
if ((ref & 1) != 0) {
rte_pktmbuf_refcnt_update(m, ref);
- while (ref-- != 0)
- rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m);
+ while (ref-- != 0) {
+ /* retry in case of failure */
+ while (rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m) != 0)
+ ;
+ }
} else {
while (ref-- != 0) {
rte_pktmbuf_refcnt_update(m, 1);
- rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m);
+ /* retry in case of failure */
+ while (rte_ring_enqueue(refcnt_mbuf_ring, m) != 0)
+ ;
}
}
rte_pktmbuf_free(m);