[PATCH-V6] config/arm: restore support for Qualcomm servers

  From the documentation:
"The SoC configuration is a combination of implementer and CPU part number
 configuration and SoC-specific configuration."

Align Qualcomm SoC configuration with the configuration of other server
SoCs (eMAG, Kunpeng 9x0): add a soc configuration to the existing
implementer configuration.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>
--
V6:
- rebase after merge of "doc: fix Arm SoCs list"
V5:
- rebase after http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210429070751.6065-1-david.marchand@redhat.com/
V4:
- use a more specific SoC name
V3:
- include doc patch
- remove Fixes line
V2:
- use the right original commit in Fixes
---
 config/arm/meson.build | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:26 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>; thomas@monjalon.net;
> Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH-V6] config/arm: restore support for Qualcomm servers
> 
> From the documentation:
> "The SoC configuration is a combination of implementer and CPU part
> number  configuration and SoC-specific configuration."
> 
> Align Qualcomm SoC configuration with the configuration of other server
> SoCs (eMAG, Kunpeng 9x0): add a soc configuration to the existing
> implementer configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>
> --
> V6:
> - rebase after merge of "doc: fix Arm SoCs list"
> V5:
> - rebase after
> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210429070751.6065-1-
> david.marchand@redhat.com/
> V4:
> - use a more specific SoC name
> V3:
> - include doc patch
> - remove Fixes line
> V2:
> - use the right original commit in Fixes
> ---
>  config/arm/meson.build | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build index
> 65f7ac672def..c68ea24f312f 100644
> --- a/config/arm/meson.build
> +++ b/config/arm/meson.build
> @@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ soc_bluefield = {
>      'numa': false
>  }
> 
> +soc_centriq2400 = {
> +    'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400',
> +    'implementer': '0x51',
> +    'part_number': '0xc00',
> +    'numa': false
> +}
> +
>  soc_cn10k = {
>      'description' : 'Marvell OCTEON 10',
>      'implementer' : '0x41',
> @@ -326,6 +333,7 @@ Start of socs list
>  generic:     Generic un-optimized build for all aarch64 machines.
>  armada:      Marvell ARMADA
>  bluefield:   NVIDIA BlueField
> +centriq2400: Qualcomm Centriq 2400
>  cn10k:       Marvell OCTEON 10
>  dpaa:        NXP DPAA
>  emag:        Ampere eMAG
> @@ -346,6 +354,7 @@ socs = {
>      'generic': soc_generic,
>      'armada': soc_armada,
>      'bluefield': soc_bluefield,
> +    'centriq2400': soc_centriq2400,
>      'cn10k' : soc_cn10k,
>      'dpaa': soc_dpaa,
>      'emag': soc_emag,
> --
> 2.29.2

I believe a meson cross file is also needed. The cross file consumes defined soc info.
Please check other cross files in config/arm for reference.
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:23 AM
> To: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>;
> Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH-V6] config/arm: restore support for Qualcomm servers
> 

In addition to Ruifeng's cross file addition, I'd also change the subject to something like "config/arm: add Qualcomm Centriq 2400 SoC config" which is more accurate (add instead of restore and the patch only adds support for one server, not multiple).

> I believe a meson cross file is also needed. The cross file consumes defined soc
> info.
> Please check other cross files in config/arm for reference.