[dpdk-dev] Remove NO_AUTOLIBS option

NO_AUTOLIBS is not required as it was not used or defined in the config files.

Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles <keith.wiles@intel.com>
---
 mk/rte.app.mk | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
  

2015-05-01 09:29, Keith Wiles:
> NO_AUTOLIBS is not required as it was not used or defined in the config files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> ---
>  mk/rte.app.mk | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

Thanks Keith for trying to clean it, but removing half of an obsolete feature
is not a real clean-up ;)
When running "git grep NO_AUTOLIBS", it will return results in
doc/guides/prog_guide

I fixed the doc and manually applied your patch based on your _LDLIBS-y patch.
Maybe I'm too kind, I know people who whould refuse this patch :)

Sorry for being long here, but I want to show the work done when applying
patches and I want to ask: is it a good thing to manually fix patches in order
to speed-up the process or should it be more strict?
  

On 5/12/15, 8:07 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

>2015-05-01 09:29, Keith Wiles:
>> NO_AUTOLIBS is not required as it was not used or defined in the config
>>files.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles <keith.wiles@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  mk/rte.app.mk | 5 -----
>>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
>Thanks Keith for trying to clean it, but removing half of an obsolete
>feature
>is not a real clean-up ;)
>When running "git grep NO_AUTOLIBS", it will return results in
>doc/guides/prog_guide

Sorry, did not find that one in the docs. I thought I had searched for
other locations.
>
>I fixed the doc and manually applied your patch based on your _LDLIBS-y
>patch.
>Maybe I'm too kind, I know people who whould refuse this patch :)
>
>Sorry for being long here, but I want to show the work done when applying
>patches and I want to ask: is it a good thing to manually fix patches in
>order
>to speed-up the process or should it be more strict?