From patchwork Thu Oct 14 03:30:12 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jie Zhou X-Patchwork-Id: 101532 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2119A0C4B; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:31:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EF2411AB; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:30:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255D44115B for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:30:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4596520B9D13; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 20:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 4596520B9D13 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1634182220; bh=l0KOGdlOqkniobGBQzdhML6GnEFyjKhs0BmqNb1StDU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LtiMPQPYB/x/o6nX8PahOy8E4aPML6UYnMR7s5SbTvA1fBVCZIc0zFfgKWpdLIYiS Nk721+SSMaWe64tp2QUNQw7G015/t9vcGDvVdy6J45vF5qW2PgxoXNxhdcXqZNN5Ck WtZmnQIkmnzlvss4aQFCMLkduGOkw5MWJuEb65WU= From: Jie Zhou To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, roretzla@microsoft.com, navasile@linux.microsoft.com, dmitrym@microsoft.com, pallavi.kadam@intel.com, talshn@nvidia.com, thomas@monjalon.net, aconole@redhat.com Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 20:30:12 -0700 Message-Id: <1634182214-24540-11-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1634182214-24540-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1630729155-24584-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> <1634182214-24540-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/12] app/test: remove two alarm_autotest cases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Remove two alarm_autotest test cases which do bogus range check on Windows. Signed-off-by: Jie Zhou --- app/test/test_alarm.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/app/test/test_alarm.c b/app/test/test_alarm.c index b4034339b8..70e97a3109 100644 --- a/app/test/test_alarm.c +++ b/app/test/test_alarm.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include "test.h" +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS static volatile int flag; static void @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ test_alarm_callback(void *cb_arg) flag = 1; printf("Callback setting flag - OK. [cb_arg = %p]\n", cb_arg); } +#endif static int test_alarm(void) @@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ test_alarm(void) return 0; #endif +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS /* check if it will fail to set alarm with wrong us value */ printf("check if it will fail to set alarm with wrong ms values\n"); if (rte_eal_alarm_set(0, test_alarm_callback, @@ -39,6 +42,7 @@ test_alarm(void) printf("should not be successful with (UINT64_MAX-1) us value\n"); return -1; } +#endif /* check if it will fail to set alarm with null callback parameter */ printf("check if it will fail to set alarm with null callback parameter\n");