diff mbox series

[4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check logic

Message ID 20191001130405.7076-3-ktraynor@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: David Marchand
Headers show
Series Coverity fixes and other cleanups | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Kevin Traynor Oct. 1, 2019, 1:04 p.m. UTC
Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which branch
of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will always be
returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.

    CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
    (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
    regardless of whether n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
    n->n_children != 0U is true, because the 'then' and 'else' branches
    are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire
    'if' statement replaced?
1506  if (n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
1507          n->n_children != 0) {
1508          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
1509                  EINVAL,
1510                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
1511                  NULL,
1512                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
    else_branch: The else branch, identical to the then branch.
1513  } else {
1514          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
1515                  EINVAL,
1516                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
1517                  NULL,
1518                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
1519  }

Coverity issue: 337928
Fixes: c820468ac99c ("net/ipn3ke: support TM")
Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

Comments

David Marchand Oct. 30, 2019, 7:59 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello Rosen,

Review please.

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which branch
> of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will always be
> returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
>
>     CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
>     (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
>     regardless of whether n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
>     n->n_children != 0U is true, because the 'then' and 'else' branches
>     are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire
>     'if' statement replaced?
> 1506  if (n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
> 1507          n->n_children != 0) {
> 1508          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> 1509                  EINVAL,
> 1510                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> 1511                  NULL,
> 1512                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>     else_branch: The else branch, identical to the then branch.
> 1513  } else {
> 1514          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> 1515                  EINVAL,
> 1516                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> 1517                  NULL,
> 1518                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> 1519  }
>
> Coverity issue: 337928
> Fixes: c820468ac99c ("net/ipn3ke: support TM")
> Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> index adf02c157..a93145d59 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> @@ -1511,10 +1511,4 @@ ipn3ke_tm_hierarchy_commit_check(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>                                                 NULL,
>                                                 rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> -                       } else {
> -                               return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> -                                               EINVAL,
> -                                               RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> -                                               NULL,
> -                                               rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>                         }
>                 }
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Kevin Traynor Nov. 5, 2019, 3:41 p.m. UTC | #2
On 30/10/2019 07:59, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Rosen,
> 
> Review please.
> 

Ping Rosen.

> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which branch
>> of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will always be
>> returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
>>
>>     CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
>>     (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
>>     regardless of whether n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
>>     n->n_children != 0U is true, because the 'then' and 'else' branches
>>     are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire
>>     'if' statement replaced?
>> 1506  if (n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
>> 1507          n->n_children != 0) {
>> 1508          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
>> 1509                  EINVAL,
>> 1510                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>> 1511                  NULL,
>> 1512                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>>     else_branch: The else branch, identical to the then branch.
>> 1513  } else {
>> 1514          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
>> 1515                  EINVAL,
>> 1516                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>> 1517                  NULL,
>> 1518                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>> 1519  }
>>
>> Coverity issue: 337928
>> Fixes: c820468ac99c ("net/ipn3ke: support TM")
>> Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c | 6 ------
>>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
>> index adf02c157..a93145d59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
>> @@ -1511,10 +1511,4 @@ ipn3ke_tm_hierarchy_commit_check(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>                                                 NULL,
>>                                                 rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>> -                       } else {
>> -                               return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
>> -                                               EINVAL,
>> -                                               RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>> -                                               NULL,
>> -                                               rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>>                         }
>>                 }
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>
>
Xu, Rosen Nov. 8, 2019, 2:35 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi David,

Too many things in these days. I have reviewed it. Thanks a lot.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 16:00
> To: Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; dpdk
> stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check
> logic
> 
> Hello Rosen,
> 
> Review please.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which
> > branch of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will
> > always be returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
> >
> >     CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
> >     (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
> >     regardless of whether n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
> >     n->n_children != 0U is true, because the 'then' and 'else' branches
> >     are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire
> >     'if' statement replaced?
> > 1506  if (n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
> > 1507          n->n_children != 0) {
> > 1508          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> > 1509                  EINVAL,
> > 1510                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> > 1511                  NULL,
> > 1512                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> >     else_branch: The else branch, identical to the then branch.
> > 1513  } else {
> > 1514          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> > 1515                  EINVAL,
> > 1516                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> > 1517                  NULL,
> > 1518                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> > 1519  }
> >
> > Coverity issue: 337928
> > Fixes: c820468ac99c ("net/ipn3ke: support TM")
> > Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c | 6 ------
> >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> > b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c index adf02c157..a93145d59 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> > @@ -1511,10 +1511,4 @@ ipn3ke_tm_hierarchy_commit_check(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >                                                 NULL,
> >                                                 rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> > -                       } else {
> > -                               return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> > -                                               EINVAL,
> > -                                               RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> > -                                               NULL,
> > -                                               rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> >                         }
> >                 }
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
> 
> --
> David Marchand

Reviewed-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>
Xu, Rosen Nov. 8, 2019, 2:45 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Kevin,

Too many things in these days, sorry for late reply.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktraynor@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 23:42
> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>; Xu, Rosen
> <rosen.xu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Ye, Xiaolong
> <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check
> logic
> 
> On 30/10/2019 07:59, David Marchand wrote:
> > Hello Rosen,
> >
> > Review please.
> >
> 
> Ping Rosen.
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which
> >> branch of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will
> >> always be returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
> >>
> >>     CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
> >>     (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
> >>     regardless of whether n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
> >>     n->n_children != 0U is true, because the 'then' and 'else' branches
> >>     are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire
> >>     'if' statement replaced?

Yes, you are right.

> >> 1506  if (n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
> >> 1507          n->n_children != 0) {
> >> 1508          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> >> 1509                  EINVAL,
> >> 1510                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> >> 1511                  NULL,
> >> 1512                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> >>     else_branch: The else branch, identical to the then branch.
> >> 1513  } else {
> >> 1514          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> >> 1515                  EINVAL,
> >> 1516                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> >> 1517                  NULL,
> >> 1518                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> >> 1519  }
> >>
> >> Coverity issue: 337928
> >> Fixes: c820468ac99c ("net/ipn3ke: support TM")
> >> Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c | 6 ------
> >>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c index adf02c157..a93145d59 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> >> @@ -1511,10 +1511,4 @@ ipn3ke_tm_hierarchy_commit_check(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >>                                                 NULL,
> >>                                                 rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> >> -                       } else {
> >> -                               return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> >> -                                               EINVAL,
> >> -                                               RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> >> -                                               NULL,
> >> -                                               rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> >>                         }
> >>                 }
> >> --
> >> 2.21.0
> >>
> >

Reviewed-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>
Kevin Traynor Nov. 8, 2019, 2:47 p.m. UTC | #5
On 08/11/2019 14:45, Xu, Rosen wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> Too many things in these days, sorry for late reply.
> 

Hi Rosen, no problem, thanks for the Ack.

Kevin.

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktraynor@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 23:42
>> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>; Xu, Rosen
>> <rosen.xu@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Ye, Xiaolong
>> <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check
>> logic
>>
>> On 30/10/2019 07:59, David Marchand wrote:
>>> Hello Rosen,
>>>
>>> Review please.
>>>
>>
>> Ping Rosen.
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which
>>>> branch of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will
>>>> always be returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
>>>>
>>>>     CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
>>>>     (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
>>>>     regardless of whether n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
>>>>     n->n_children != 0U is true, because the 'then' and 'else' branches
>>>>     are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire
>>>>     'if' statement replaced?
> 
> Yes, you are right.
> 
>>>> 1506  if (n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
>>>> 1507          n->n_children != 0) {
>>>> 1508          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
>>>> 1509                  EINVAL,
>>>> 1510                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>>> 1511                  NULL,
>>>> 1512                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>>>>     else_branch: The else branch, identical to the then branch.
>>>> 1513  } else {
>>>> 1514          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
>>>> 1515                  EINVAL,
>>>> 1516                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>>> 1517                  NULL,
>>>> 1518                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>>>> 1519  }
>>>>
>>>> Coverity issue: 337928
>>>> Fixes: c820468ac99c ("net/ipn3ke: support TM")
>>>> Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c | 6 ------
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c index adf02c157..a93145d59 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
>>>> @@ -1511,10 +1511,4 @@ ipn3ke_tm_hierarchy_commit_check(struct
>> rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>>>                                                 NULL,
>>>>                                                 rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>>>> -                       } else {
>>>> -                               return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
>>>> -                                               EINVAL,
>>>> -                                               RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>>> -                                               NULL,
>>>> -                                               rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>>>>                         }
>>>>                 }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.21.0
>>>>
>>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>
>
Xu, Rosen Nov. 8, 2019, 2:52 p.m. UTC | #6
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktraynor@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 21:04
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Xu, Rosen
> <rosen.xu@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check logic
> 
> Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which branch of
> the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will always be returned if
> this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
> 
>     CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
>     (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
>     regardless of whether n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
>     n->n_children != 0U is true, because the 'then' and 'else' branches
>     are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire
>     'if' statement replaced?

Okay

> 1506  if (n->level != IPN3KE_TM_NODE_LEVEL_COS ||
> 1507          n->n_children != 0) {
> 1508          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> 1509                  EINVAL,
> 1510                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> 1511                  NULL,
> 1512                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>     else_branch: The else branch, identical to the then branch.
> 1513  } else {
> 1514          return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> 1515                  EINVAL,
> 1516                  RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> 1517                  NULL,
> 1518                  rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> 1519  }
> 
> Coverity issue: 337928
> Fixes: c820468ac99c ("net/ipn3ke: support TM")
> Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c index adf02c157..a93145d59 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
> @@ -1511,10 +1511,4 @@ ipn3ke_tm_hierarchy_commit_check(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
>  						NULL,
>  						rte_strerror(EINVAL));
> -			} else {
> -				return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
> -						EINVAL,
> -
> 	RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> -						NULL,
> -						rte_strerror(EINVAL));
>  			}
>  		}
> --
> 2.21.0

Reviewed-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
index adf02c157..a93145d59 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_tm.c
@@ -1511,10 +1511,4 @@  ipn3ke_tm_hierarchy_commit_check(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 						NULL,
 						rte_strerror(EINVAL));
-			} else {
-				return -rte_tm_error_set(error,
-						EINVAL,
-						RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
-						NULL,
-						rte_strerror(EINVAL));
 			}
 		}