Checks
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ci/checkpatch | success | coding style OK |
| ci/Intel-compilation | success | Compilation OK |
Commit Message
Qi Zhang
June 15, 2020, 2:04 a.m. UTC
A u8 idx in ice_acl_add_entry causes the code to truncate the values
greater than 255 to 255 or less when calling ice_aq_program_acl_entry()
resulting in the wrong TCAM index being programmed for the specified
rule. The result is that the rule action doesn't work correctly
(packets don't get routed to the correct queue or dropped if that
is the action). Fix the issue by changing the variable to be a u16
again.
Fixes: f3202a097f12 ("net/ice/base: add ACL module")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Paul M Stillwell Jr <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ice/base/ice_acl_ctrl.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_acl_ctrl.c b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_acl_ctrl.c index e67605141..39b399dd4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_acl_ctrl.c +++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_acl_ctrl.c @@ -934,9 +934,10 @@ ice_acl_add_entry(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_acl_scen *scen, enum ice_acl_entry_prior prior, u8 *keys, u8 *inverts, struct ice_acl_act_entry *acts, u8 acts_cnt, u16 *entry_idx) { - u8 i, entry_tcam, num_cscd, idx, offset; + u8 i, entry_tcam, num_cscd, offset; struct ice_aqc_acl_data buf; enum ice_status status = ICE_SUCCESS; + u16 idx; if (!scen) return ICE_ERR_DOES_NOT_EXIST;