Message ID | 20201221073848.22366-1-joyce.kong@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | David Marchand |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1] lib/rcu: use rte atomic thread fence wrapper instead | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
ci/Intel-compilation | success | Compilation OK |
ci/iol-testing | success | Testing PASS |
ci/iol-abi-testing | success | Testing PASS |
ci/iol-intel-Functional | success | Functional Testing PASS |
ci/iol-intel-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional | success | Functional Testing PASS |
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
ci/checkpatch | success | coding style OK |
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:40 AM Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com> wrote: > > Use rte_atomic_thread_fence wrapper which has been provided for > __atomic_thread_fence builtins to support optimized code for > __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST memory order on x86 platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h index fa2b881bd..18811c1cc 100644 --- a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h +++ b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h @@ -329,12 +329,7 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_online(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, unsigned int thread_id) * writer might not see that the reader is online, even though * the reader is referencing the shared data structure. */ -#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64 - /* rte_smp_mb() for x86 is lighter */ - rte_smp_mb(); -#else - __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); -#endif + rte_atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); } /**