diff mbox series

[v1] test/crypto: maxlen calculation update

Message ID 20210929153809.69039-1-kai.ji@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: akhil goyal
Headers
Series [v1] test/crypto: maxlen calculation update |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/iol-aarch64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-unit-testing fail Testing issues
ci/iol-x86_64-compile-testing fail Testing issues
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS

Commit Message

Ji, Kai Sept. 29, 2021, 3:38 p.m. UTC 
  Update the calculation of the max length needed when converting mbuf to
data vec in partial digest test case. This update make sure the enough
vec buffers are allocated for the appended digest in sgl op for QAT raw
datapath api.

Fixes: 4868f6591c6f ("test/crypto: add cases for raw datapath API")
Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Fan Zhang Sept. 30, 2021, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #1 
CCing to stable@dpdk.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 4:38 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev v1] test/crypto: maxlen calculation update
> 
> Update the calculation of the max length needed when converting mbuf to
> data vec in partial digest test case. This update make sure the enough
> vec buffers are allocated for the appended digest in sgl op for QAT raw
> datapath api.
> 
> Fixes: 4868f6591c6f ("test/crypto: add cases for raw datapath API")
> Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> index 16d770a17f..ea46911648 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ post_process_raw_dp_op(void *user_data,
> 	uint32_t index __rte_unused,
>  			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR;
>  }
> 
> +static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
> +struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params = &testsuite_params;
> +static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
> +
>  void
>  process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id,
>  		struct rte_crypto_op *op, uint8_t is_cipher, uint8_t is_auth,
> @@ -181,6 +185,7 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> qp_id,
>  	struct rte_crypto_sgl sgl;
>  	uint32_t max_len;
>  	union rte_cryptodev_session_ctx sess;
> +	uint64_t auth_end_iova;
>  	uint32_t count = 0;
>  	struct rte_crypto_raw_dp_ctx *ctx;
>  	uint32_t cipher_offset = 0, cipher_len = 0, auth_offset = 0,
> @@ -190,6 +195,9 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> qp_id,
>  	int ctx_service_size;
>  	int32_t status = 0;
>  	int enqueue_status, dequeue_status;
> +	struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> +	/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api*/
> +	int is_sgl = sop->m_src->nb_segs > 1;
> 
>  	ctx_service_size = rte_cryptodev_get_raw_dp_ctx_size(dev_id);
>  	if (ctx_service_size < 0) {
> @@ -255,6 +263,29 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> qp_id,
>  		digest.va = (void *)sop->auth.digest.data;
>  		digest.iova = sop->auth.digest.phys_addr;
> 
> +		if (is_sgl) {
> +			uint32_t remaining_off = auth_offset + auth_len;
> +			struct rte_mbuf *sgl_buf = sop->m_src;
> +
> +			while (remaining_off >=
> rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf)
> +					&& sgl_buf->next != NULL) {
> +				remaining_off -=
> rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf);
> +				sgl_buf = sgl_buf->next;
> +			}
> +
> +			auth_end_iova =
> (uint64_t)rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(
> +				sgl_buf, remaining_off);
> +		} else {
> +			/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api */
> +			auth_end_iova = rte_pktmbuf_iova(op->sym-
> >m_src) +
> +							 auth_offset +
> auth_len;
> +		}
> +		/* Then check if digest-encrypted conditions are met */
> +		if ((auth_offset + auth_len < cipher_offset + cipher_len) &&
> +				(digest.iova == auth_end_iova) && is_sgl)
> +			max_len = RTE_MAX(max_len, auth_offset +
> auth_len +
> +				ut_params->auth_xform.auth.digest_length);
> +
>  	} else if (is_cipher) {
>  		cipher_offset = sop->cipher.data.offset;
>  		cipher_len = sop->cipher.data.length;
> @@ -477,10 +508,6 @@ process_crypto_request(uint8_t dev_id, struct
> rte_crypto_op *op)
>  	return op;
>  }
> 
> -static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
> -struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params = &testsuite_params;
> -static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
> -
>  static int
>  testsuite_setup(void)
>  {
> --
> 2.17.1
Akhil Goyal Oct. 7, 2021, 12:46 p.m. UTC | #2 
> Update the calculation of the max length needed when converting mbuf to
> data vec in partial digest test case. This update make sure the enough
> vec buffers are allocated for the appended digest in sgl op for QAT raw
> datapath api.
> 
> Fixes: 4868f6591c6f ("test/crypto: add cases for raw datapath API")
> Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> index 16d770a17f..ea46911648 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ post_process_raw_dp_op(void *user_data,
> 	uint32_t index __rte_unused,
>  			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR;
>  }
> 
> +static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
> +struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params = &testsuite_params;
> +static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
> +
>  void
>  process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id,
>  		struct rte_crypto_op *op, uint8_t is_cipher, uint8_t is_auth,
> @@ -181,6 +185,7 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> qp_id,
>  	struct rte_crypto_sgl sgl;
>  	uint32_t max_len;
>  	union rte_cryptodev_session_ctx sess;
> +	uint64_t auth_end_iova;
>  	uint32_t count = 0;
>  	struct rte_crypto_raw_dp_ctx *ctx;
>  	uint32_t cipher_offset = 0, cipher_len = 0, auth_offset = 0,
> @@ -190,6 +195,9 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> qp_id,
>  	int ctx_service_size;
>  	int32_t status = 0;
>  	int enqueue_status, dequeue_status;
> +	struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> +	/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api*/
> +	int is_sgl = sop->m_src->nb_segs > 1;

There is a patch series pending to be merged which support oop in raw dp api.
Can we sync this patch based on that?
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210907075957.28848-4-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com/

> 
>  	ctx_service_size = rte_cryptodev_get_raw_dp_ctx_size(dev_id);
>  	if (ctx_service_size < 0) {
> @@ -255,6 +263,29 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> qp_id,
>  		digest.va = (void *)sop->auth.digest.data;
>  		digest.iova = sop->auth.digest.phys_addr;
> 
> +		if (is_sgl) {
> +			uint32_t remaining_off = auth_offset + auth_len;
> +			struct rte_mbuf *sgl_buf = sop->m_src;
> +
> +			while (remaining_off >=
> rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf)
> +					&& sgl_buf->next != NULL) {
> +				remaining_off -=
> rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf);
> +				sgl_buf = sgl_buf->next;
> +			}
> +
> +			auth_end_iova = (uint64_t)rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(
> +				sgl_buf, remaining_off);
> +		} else {
> +			/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api */
> +			auth_end_iova = rte_pktmbuf_iova(op->sym->m_src)
> +
> +							 auth_offset +
> auth_len;
> +		}
> +		/* Then check if digest-encrypted conditions are met */
> +		if ((auth_offset + auth_len < cipher_offset + cipher_len) &&
> +				(digest.iova == auth_end_iova) && is_sgl)
> +			max_len = RTE_MAX(max_len, auth_offset +
> auth_len +
> +				ut_params->auth_xform.auth.digest_length);
> +
>  	} else if (is_cipher) {
>  		cipher_offset = sop->cipher.data.offset;
>  		cipher_len = sop->cipher.data.length;
> @@ -477,10 +508,6 @@ process_crypto_request(uint8_t dev_id, struct
> rte_crypto_op *op)
>  	return op;
>  }
> 
> -static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
> -struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params = &testsuite_params;
> -static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
> -
>  static int
>  testsuite_setup(void)
>  {
> --
> 2.17.1
Fan Zhang Oct. 7, 2021, 1:54 p.m. UTC | #3 
Hi Akhil and Hemant,

This is a generic problem to raw_api applies either with dst_buf added or not.

The idea is for SGL test when Wireless algo digest encrypted case is tested and
RTE_MAX(cipher_off + cipher len, auth_off + auth_len) is smaller than 
RTE_MAX(cipher_off + cipher len, auth_off + auth_len + digest_len), the original
code will not add digest data SGL info into rte_crypto_sgl, leave alone the 4-byte
digest is split into 2 2-byte segments.

This patch only try to address the problem and as far as I can see from the patch
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210907075957.28848-15-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com/
the problem is not touched.

Regards,
Fan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 1:47 PM
> To: Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com;
> g.singh@nxp.com
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev v1] test/crypto: maxlen calculation
> update
> 
> > Update the calculation of the max length needed when converting mbuf to
> > data vec in partial digest test case. This update make sure the enough
> > vec buffers are allocated for the appended digest in sgl op for QAT raw
> > datapath api.
> >
> > Fixes: 4868f6591c6f ("test/crypto: add cases for raw datapath API")
> > Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> -
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > index 16d770a17f..ea46911648 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ post_process_raw_dp_op(void *user_data,
> > 	uint32_t index __rte_unused,
> >  			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR;
> >  }
> >
> > +static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
> > +struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params =
> &testsuite_params;
> > +static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
> > +
> >  void
> >  process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id,
> >  		struct rte_crypto_op *op, uint8_t is_cipher, uint8_t is_auth,
> > @@ -181,6 +185,7 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> > qp_id,
> >  	struct rte_crypto_sgl sgl;
> >  	uint32_t max_len;
> >  	union rte_cryptodev_session_ctx sess;
> > +	uint64_t auth_end_iova;
> >  	uint32_t count = 0;
> >  	struct rte_crypto_raw_dp_ctx *ctx;
> >  	uint32_t cipher_offset = 0, cipher_len = 0, auth_offset = 0,
> > @@ -190,6 +195,9 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> > qp_id,
> >  	int ctx_service_size;
> >  	int32_t status = 0;
> >  	int enqueue_status, dequeue_status;
> > +	struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> > +	/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api*/
> > +	int is_sgl = sop->m_src->nb_segs > 1;
> 
> There is a patch series pending to be merged which support oop in raw dp api.
> Can we sync this patch based on that?
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210907075957.28848-4-
> hemant.agrawal@nxp.com/
> 
> >
> >  	ctx_service_size = rte_cryptodev_get_raw_dp_ctx_size(dev_id);
> >  	if (ctx_service_size < 0) {
> > @@ -255,6 +263,29 @@ process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t
> > qp_id,
> >  		digest.va = (void *)sop->auth.digest.data;
> >  		digest.iova = sop->auth.digest.phys_addr;
> >
> > +		if (is_sgl) {
> > +			uint32_t remaining_off = auth_offset + auth_len;
> > +			struct rte_mbuf *sgl_buf = sop->m_src;
> > +
> > +			while (remaining_off >=
> > rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf)
> > +					&& sgl_buf->next != NULL) {
> > +				remaining_off -=
> > rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf);
> > +				sgl_buf = sgl_buf->next;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			auth_end_iova =
> (uint64_t)rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(
> > +				sgl_buf, remaining_off);
> > +		} else {
> > +			/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api */
> > +			auth_end_iova = rte_pktmbuf_iova(op->sym-
> >m_src)
> > +
> > +							 auth_offset +
> > auth_len;
> > +		}
> > +		/* Then check if digest-encrypted conditions are met */
> > +		if ((auth_offset + auth_len < cipher_offset + cipher_len) &&
> > +				(digest.iova == auth_end_iova) && is_sgl)
> > +			max_len = RTE_MAX(max_len, auth_offset +
> > auth_len +
> > +				ut_params->auth_xform.auth.digest_length);
> > +
> >  	} else if (is_cipher) {
> >  		cipher_offset = sop->cipher.data.offset;
> >  		cipher_len = sop->cipher.data.length;
> > @@ -477,10 +508,6 @@ process_crypto_request(uint8_t dev_id, struct
> > rte_crypto_op *op)
> >  	return op;
> >  }
> >
> > -static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
> > -struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params =
> &testsuite_params;
> > -static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
> > -
> >  static int
> >  testsuite_setup(void)
> >  {
> > --
> > 2.17.1
Akhil Goyal Oct. 7, 2021, 1:59 p.m. UTC | #4 
Hi Fan,

> Hi Akhil and Hemant,
> 
> This is a generic problem to raw_api applies either with dst_buf added or
> not.
> 
> The idea is for SGL test when Wireless algo digest encrypted case is tested
> and
> RTE_MAX(cipher_off + cipher len, auth_off + auth_len) is smaller than
> RTE_MAX(cipher_off + cipher len, auth_off + auth_len + digest_len), the
> original
> code will not add digest data SGL info into rte_crypto_sgl, leave alone the 4-
> byte
> digest is split into 2 2-byte segments.
> 

There are comments in the patch 
/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api */

This is now supported in the patchset that I mentioned.
So Can we update according to that?
Fan Zhang Oct. 7, 2021, 2:34 p.m. UTC | #5 
Hi Akhil,

Sorry didn't catch you are mentioning this part - yes we have been preparing
for adding oop support into qat for a while :-). Rebecca has already tested and
acked the patchset. We are waiting for you merging them before rebasing.

Regards,
Fan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 3:00 PM
> To: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; g.singh@nxp.com
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev v1] test/crypto: maxlen calculation
> update
> 
> Hi Fan,
> 
> > Hi Akhil and Hemant,
> >
> > This is a generic problem to raw_api applies either with dst_buf added or
> > not.
> >
> > The idea is for SGL test when Wireless algo digest encrypted case is tested
> > and
> > RTE_MAX(cipher_off + cipher len, auth_off + auth_len) is smaller than
> > RTE_MAX(cipher_off + cipher len, auth_off + auth_len + digest_len), the
> > original
> > code will not add digest data SGL info into rte_crypto_sgl, leave alone the
> 4-
> > byte
> > digest is split into 2 2-byte segments.
> >
> 
> There are comments in the patch
> /* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api */
> 
> This is now supported in the patchset that I mentioned.
> So Can we update according to that?
Akhil Goyal Oct. 7, 2021, 3:20 p.m. UTC | #6 
> Sorry didn't catch you are mentioning this part - yes we have been preparing
> for adding oop support into qat for a while :-). Rebecca has already tested
> and
> acked the patchset. We are waiting for you merging them before rebasing.
> 
I am expecting a new patchset from Hemant to handle Konstantin's comments.
Fan Zhang Oct. 7, 2021, 3:43 p.m. UTC | #7 
Thanks Akhil - again anything we can help please let us know.

Regards,
Fan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 4:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; g.singh@nxp.com
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev v1] test/crypto: maxlen calculation
> update
> 
> > Sorry didn't catch you are mentioning this part - yes we have been
> preparing
> > for adding oop support into qat for a while :-). Rebecca has already tested
> > and
> > acked the patchset. We are waiting for you merging them before rebasing.
> >
> I am expecting a new patchset from Hemant to handle Konstantin's
> comments.
Ji, Kai Oct. 8, 2021, 11:40 a.m. UTC | #8 
Hi Akhil,

I just update the v2: http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211008113345.31818-1-kai.ji@intel.com/
This patch is a generic fix of test case for SGL op, I think there is no dependence with Hemant's patch.

Regards

Kai 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 4:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; g.singh@nxp.com
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev v1] test/crypto: maxlen calculation
> update
> 
> > Sorry didn't catch you are mentioning this part - yes we have been
> > preparing for adding oop support into qat for a while :-). Rebecca has
> > already tested and acked the patchset. We are waiting for you merging
> > them before rebasing.
> >
> I am expecting a new patchset from Hemant to handle Konstantin's
> comments.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
index 16d770a17f..ea46911648 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
@@ -167,6 +167,10 @@  post_process_raw_dp_op(void *user_data,	uint32_t index __rte_unused,
 			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR;
 }
 
+static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
+struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params = &testsuite_params;
+static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
+
 void
 process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id,
 		struct rte_crypto_op *op, uint8_t is_cipher, uint8_t is_auth,
@@ -181,6 +185,7 @@  process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id,
 	struct rte_crypto_sgl sgl;
 	uint32_t max_len;
 	union rte_cryptodev_session_ctx sess;
+	uint64_t auth_end_iova;
 	uint32_t count = 0;
 	struct rte_crypto_raw_dp_ctx *ctx;
 	uint32_t cipher_offset = 0, cipher_len = 0, auth_offset = 0,
@@ -190,6 +195,9 @@  process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id,
 	int ctx_service_size;
 	int32_t status = 0;
 	int enqueue_status, dequeue_status;
+	struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
+	/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api*/
+	int is_sgl = sop->m_src->nb_segs > 1;
 
 	ctx_service_size = rte_cryptodev_get_raw_dp_ctx_size(dev_id);
 	if (ctx_service_size < 0) {
@@ -255,6 +263,29 @@  process_sym_raw_dp_op(uint8_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id,
 		digest.va = (void *)sop->auth.digest.data;
 		digest.iova = sop->auth.digest.phys_addr;
 
+		if (is_sgl) {
+			uint32_t remaining_off = auth_offset + auth_len;
+			struct rte_mbuf *sgl_buf = sop->m_src;
+
+			while (remaining_off >= rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf)
+					&& sgl_buf->next != NULL) {
+				remaining_off -= rte_pktmbuf_data_len(sgl_buf);
+				sgl_buf = sgl_buf->next;
+			}
+
+			auth_end_iova = (uint64_t)rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(
+				sgl_buf, remaining_off);
+		} else {
+			/* oop is not supported in raw hw dp api */
+			auth_end_iova = rte_pktmbuf_iova(op->sym->m_src) +
+							 auth_offset + auth_len;
+		}
+		/* Then check if digest-encrypted conditions are met */
+		if ((auth_offset + auth_len < cipher_offset + cipher_len) &&
+				(digest.iova == auth_end_iova) && is_sgl)
+			max_len = RTE_MAX(max_len, auth_offset + auth_len +
+				ut_params->auth_xform.auth.digest_length);
+
 	} else if (is_cipher) {
 		cipher_offset = sop->cipher.data.offset;
 		cipher_len = sop->cipher.data.length;
@@ -477,10 +508,6 @@  process_crypto_request(uint8_t dev_id, struct rte_crypto_op *op)
 	return op;
 }
 
-static struct crypto_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
-struct crypto_testsuite_params *p_testsuite_params = &testsuite_params;
-static struct crypto_unittest_params unittest_params;
-
 static int
 testsuite_setup(void)
 {