interrupts: do not resize event list for non MSIX

  Resizing event list only makes sense in MSIX case.

Besides, event list has always been RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID large.
Let's restore this assumption for code that might rely on this property
and only enlarge the event list when necessary.

Bugzilla ID: 843, 865
Fixes: 8cb5d08db940 ("interrupts: extend event list")

Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 1:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>; Dmitry Kozlyuk
> <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>; Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH] interrupts: do not resize event list for non MSIX
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Resizing event list only makes sense in MSIX case.
> 
> Besides, event list has always been RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID large.
> Let's restore this assumption for code that might rely on this property and
> only enlarge the event list when necessary.
> 
> Bugzilla ID: 843, 865
> Fixes: 8cb5d08db940 ("interrupts: extend event list")
> 

Thanks David for fixing this.

Acked-by: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>

Thanks
Harman

> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> index f622e7f8e6..edcee92556 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> @@ -266,12 +266,6 @@ pci_vfio_setup_interrupts(struct rte_pci_device
> *dev, int vfio_dev_fd)
>  			return -1;
>  		}
> 
> -		/* Reallocate the efds and elist fields of intr_handle based
> -		 * on PCI device MSIX size.
> -		 */
> -		if (rte_intr_event_list_update(dev->intr_handle, irq.count))
> -			return -1;
> -
>  		/* if this vector cannot be used with eventfd, fail if we
> explicitly
>  		 * specified interrupt type, otherwise continue */
>  		if ((irq.flags & VFIO_IRQ_INFO_EVENTFD) == 0) { @@ -283,6
> +277,14 @@ pci_vfio_setup_interrupts(struct rte_pci_device *dev, int
> vfio_dev_fd)
>  				continue;
>  		}
> 
> +		/* Reallocate the efds and elist fields of intr_handle based
> +		 * on PCI device MSIX size.
> +		 */
> +		if (i == VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX &&
> +				(uint32_t)rte_intr_nb_intr_get(dev-
> >intr_handle) < irq.count &&
> +				rte_intr_event_list_update(dev->intr_handle,
> irq.count))
> +			return -1;
> +
>  		/* set up an eventfd for interrupts */
>  		fd = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK | EFD_CLOEXEC);
>  		if (fd < 0) {
> --
> 2.23.0
  

On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:38 AM Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com> wrote:
> > Resizing event list only makes sense in MSIX case.
> >
> > Besides, event list has always been RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID large.
> > Let's restore this assumption for code that might rely on this property and
> > only enlarge the event list when necessary.
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 843, 865
> > Fixes: 8cb5d08db940 ("interrupts: extend event list")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>

Applied, thanks.