diff mbox series

net/mlx5: fix metadata endianness in modify field action

Message ID 20211129123252.19408-1-viacheslavo@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Raslan Darawsheh
Headers show
Series net/mlx5: fix metadata endianness in modify field action | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/iol-aarch64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Slava Ovsiienko Nov. 29, 2021, 12:32 p.m. UTC
As modify field action immediate source parameter the metadata
should follow the CPU endianness (according to SET_META action
structure format), and mlx5 PMD wrongly handled the immediate
parameter metadata buffer as big-endian, resulting in wrong
metadata set action with incorrect endianness.

Fixes: 40c8fb1fd3b3 ("net/mlx5: update modify field action")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Raslan Darawsheh Dec. 6, 2021, 8:56 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 2:33 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasland@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix metadata endianness in modify field action
> 
> As modify field action immediate source parameter the metadata
> should follow the CPU endianness (according to SET_META action
> structure format), and mlx5 PMD wrongly handled the immediate
> parameter metadata buffer as big-endian, resulting in wrong
> metadata set action with incorrect endianness.
> 
> Fixes: 40c8fb1fd3b3 ("net/mlx5: update modify field action")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>

Patch applied to next-net-mlx,

Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
Ferruh Yigit Dec. 7, 2021, 1:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11/29/2021 12:32 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> As modify field action immediate source parameter the metadata
> should follow the CPU endianness (according to SET_META action
> structure format), and mlx5 PMD wrongly handled the immediate
> parameter metadata buffer as big-endian, resulting in wrong
> metadata set action with incorrect endianness.
> 
> Fixes: 40c8fb1fd3b3 ("net/mlx5: update modify field action")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> index 4834c752d9..1c6cae8779 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> @@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static void
>   mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info
>   		(const struct rte_flow_action_modify_data *data,
>   		 struct field_modify_info *info, uint32_t *mask,
> -		 uint32_t width, uint32_t *shift, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +		 uint32_t width, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,

Hi Viacheslav,

Is removing (unused) 'shift' variable related to the problem mentioned
in the commit log?

Only below "meta = rte_cpu_to_be_32(meta);" change block seems fixing
the issue and rest is cleanup, if that is the case can you please split
the patch?
Slava Ovsiienko Dec. 16, 2021, 9:50 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi, Ferruh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 15:45
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasland@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix metadata endianness in modify field action
> 
> On 11/29/2021 12:32 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> > As modify field action immediate source parameter the metadata should
> > follow the CPU endianness (according to SET_META action structure
> > format), and mlx5 PMD wrongly handled the immediate parameter
> metadata
> > buffer as big-endian, resulting in wrong metadata set action with
> > incorrect endianness.
> >
> > Fixes: 40c8fb1fd3b3 ("net/mlx5: update modify field action")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> > b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c index 4834c752d9..1c6cae8779 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> > @@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static void
> >   mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info
> >   		(const struct rte_flow_action_modify_data *data,
> >   		 struct field_modify_info *info, uint32_t *mask,
> > -		 uint32_t width, uint32_t *shift, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > +		 uint32_t width, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> 
> Hi Viacheslav,
> 
> Is removing (unused) 'shift' variable related to the problem mentioned in the
> commit log?
Related indirectly to metadata, but not directly to the issue. 
"shift" is unused leftover after changing immediate value format.
And this patch just provides collateral cleanup. Do you think we should
separate into dedicated cleanup patch? Or mention this cleanup in commit
message?

With best regards,
Slava



> 
> Only below "meta = rte_cpu_to_be_32(meta);" change block seems fixing the
> issue and rest is cleanup, if that is the case can you please split the patch?
Ferruh Yigit Dec. 17, 2021, 12:59 p.m. UTC | #4
On 12/16/2021 9:50 AM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote:
> Hi, Ferruh
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 15:45
>> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
>> <rasland@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix metadata endianness in modify field action
>>
>> On 11/29/2021 12:32 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
>>> As modify field action immediate source parameter the metadata should
>>> follow the CPU endianness (according to SET_META action structure
>>> format), and mlx5 PMD wrongly handled the immediate parameter
>> metadata
>>> buffer as big-endian, resulting in wrong metadata set action with
>>> incorrect endianness.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 40c8fb1fd3b3 ("net/mlx5: update modify field action")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>>>    1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
>>> b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c index 4834c752d9..1c6cae8779 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
>>> @@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static void
>>>    mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info
>>>    		(const struct rte_flow_action_modify_data *data,
>>>    		 struct field_modify_info *info, uint32_t *mask,
>>> -		 uint32_t width, uint32_t *shift, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> +		 uint32_t width, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>
>> Hi Viacheslav,
>>
>> Is removing (unused) 'shift' variable related to the problem mentioned in the
>> commit log?
> Related indirectly to metadata, but not directly to the issue.
> "shift" is unused leftover after changing immediate value format.
> And this patch just provides collateral cleanup. Do you think we should
> separate into dedicated cleanup patch? Or mention this cleanup in commit
> message?
> 

if not directly related I think better to split on its own patch, this
makes it more clear to possible future references to the patches.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index 4834c752d9..1c6cae8779 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@  static void
 mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info
 		(const struct rte_flow_action_modify_data *data,
 		 struct field_modify_info *info, uint32_t *mask,
-		 uint32_t width, uint32_t *shift, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
+		 uint32_t width, struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 		 const struct rte_flow_attr *attr, struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
@@ -1820,16 +1820,11 @@  mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info
 		{
 			uint32_t meta_mask = priv->sh->dv_meta_mask;
 			uint32_t meta_count = __builtin_popcount(meta_mask);
-			uint32_t msk_c0 =
-				rte_cpu_to_be_32(priv->sh->dv_regc0_mask);
-			uint32_t shl_c0 = rte_bsf32(msk_c0);
 			int reg = flow_dv_get_metadata_reg(dev, attr, error);
 			if (reg < 0)
 				return;
 			MLX5_ASSERT(reg != REG_NON);
 			MLX5_ASSERT((unsigned int)reg < RTE_DIM(reg_to_field));
-			if (reg == REG_C_0)
-				*shift = shl_c0;
 			info[idx] = (struct field_modify_info){4, 0,
 						reg_to_field[reg]};
 			if (mask)
@@ -1881,29 +1876,33 @@  flow_dv_convert_action_modify_field
 	struct field_modify_info dcopy[MLX5_ACT_MAX_MOD_FIELDS] = {
 								{0, 0, 0} };
 	uint32_t mask[MLX5_ACT_MAX_MOD_FIELDS] = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
-	uint32_t type;
-	uint32_t shift = 0;
+	uint32_t type, meta = 0;
 
 	if (conf->src.field == RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER ||
 	    conf->src.field == RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE) {
 		type = MLX5_MODIFICATION_TYPE_SET;
 		/** For SET fill the destination field (field) first. */
 		mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info(&conf->dst, field, mask,
-						  conf->width, &shift, dev,
+						  conf->width, dev,
 						  attr, error);
 		item.spec = conf->src.field == RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER ?
 					(void *)(uintptr_t)conf->src.pvalue :
 					(void *)(uintptr_t)&conf->src.value;
+		if (conf->dst.field == RTE_FLOW_FIELD_META) {
+			meta = *(const unaligned_uint32_t *)item.spec;
+			meta = rte_cpu_to_be_32(meta);
+			item.spec = &meta;
+		}
 	} else {
 		type = MLX5_MODIFICATION_TYPE_COPY;
 		/** For COPY fill the destination field (dcopy) without mask. */
 		mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info(&conf->dst, dcopy, NULL,
-						  conf->width, &shift, dev,
+						  conf->width, dev,
 						  attr, error);
 		/** Then construct the source field (field) with mask. */
 		mlx5_flow_field_id_to_modify_info(&conf->src, field, mask,
-						  conf->width, &shift,
-						  dev, attr, error);
+						  conf->width, dev,
+						  attr, error);
 	}
 	item.mask = &mask;
 	return flow_dv_convert_modify_action(&item,