/lib/eal: fix failed to stop device monitor error
Checks
Commit Message
From: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
The ret value in rte_dev_event_monitor_stop stands for whether the
monitor has been successfully closed ,and should not bind with
rte_intr_callback_unregister,so once it goes to the right exit point of
rte_dev_event_monitor, the ret value should be set to 0.
Also ,the refmonitor count has been carefully evaluated ,the value
change from 1 to 0 ,so there is no potential memory leak failure.
Fixes: 1fef6ced07f3 ("eal/linux: allow multiple starts of event monitor")
Cc:stable@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
---
lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Comments
+Cc Harman, maintainer of interrupt subsystem.
11/02/2022 09:41, wenxuanx.wu@intel.com:
> From: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
>
> The ret value in rte_dev_event_monitor_stop stands for whether the
> monitor has been successfully closed ,and should not bind with
> rte_intr_callback_unregister,so once it goes to the right exit point of
> rte_dev_event_monitor, the ret value should be set to 0.
>
> Also ,the refmonitor count has been carefully evaluated ,the value
> change from 1 to 0 ,so there is no potential memory leak failure.
>
> Fixes: 1fef6ced07f3 ("eal/linux: allow multiple starts of event monitor")
> Cc:stable@intel.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> index bde55a3d92..4646e8a550 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ rte_dev_event_monitor_stop(void)
> close(rte_intr_fd_get(intr_handle));
> rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
> intr_handle = NULL;
> + ret = 0;
>
> monitor_refcount--;
>
>
Let's start a talk about this patch.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: 2022年2月13日 19:30
> To: Wu, WenxuanX <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
> Subject: Re: [DPDK] /lib/eal: fix failed to stop device monitor error
>
> +Cc Harman, maintainer of interrupt subsystem.
>
> 11/02/2022 09:41, wenxuanx.wu@intel.com:
> > From: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> >
> > The ret value in rte_dev_event_monitor_stop stands for whether the
> > monitor has been successfully closed ,and should not bind with
> > rte_intr_callback_unregister,so once it goes to the right exit point
> > of rte_dev_event_monitor, the ret value should be set to 0.
> >
> > Also ,the refmonitor count has been carefully evaluated ,the value
> > change from 1 to 0 ,so there is no potential memory leak failure.
> >
> > Fixes: 1fef6ced07f3 ("eal/linux: allow multiple starts of event
> > monitor") Cc:stable@intel.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c index
> > bde55a3d92..4646e8a550 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> > +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> > @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ rte_dev_event_monitor_stop(void)
> > close(rte_intr_fd_get(intr_handle));
> > rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
> > intr_handle = NULL;
> > + ret = 0;
> >
> > monitor_refcount--;
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Hello,
The title should start with eal/linux:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:01 AM <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
>
> The ret value in rte_dev_event_monitor_stop stands for whether the
> monitor has been successfully closed ,and should not bind with
> rte_intr_callback_unregister,so once it goes to the right exit point of
> rte_dev_event_monitor, the ret value should be set to 0.
>
> Also ,the refmonitor count has been carefully evaluated ,the value
> change from 1 to 0 ,so there is no potential memory leak failure.
Please, fix formatting around ',': a space should be after.
Is it a real issue you noticed? Or a theoretical issue based on code
review, reported by a static code analysis tool?
>
> Fixes: 1fef6ced07f3 ("eal/linux: allow multiple starts of event monitor")
> Cc:stable@intel.com
stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> index bde55a3d92..4646e8a550 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ rte_dev_event_monitor_stop(void)
> close(rte_intr_fd_get(intr_handle));
> rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
> intr_handle = NULL;
> + ret = 0;
>
> monitor_refcount--;
>
This change looks ok to me.
Harman, Long, wdyt?
> Subject: Re: [DPDK] /lib/eal: fix failed to stop device monitor error
>
> Hello,
>
>
> The title should start with eal/linux:
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:01 AM <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> >
> > The ret value in rte_dev_event_monitor_stop stands for whether the
> > monitor has been successfully closed ,and should not bind with
> > rte_intr_callback_unregister,so once it goes to the right exit point
> > of rte_dev_event_monitor, the ret value should be set to 0.
> >
> > Also ,the refmonitor count has been carefully evaluated ,the value
> > change from 1 to 0 ,so there is no potential memory leak failure.
>
> Please, fix formatting around ',': a space should be after.
>
>
> Is it a real issue you noticed? Or a theoretical issue based on code review,
> reported by a static code analysis tool?
>
>
> >
> > Fixes: 1fef6ced07f3 ("eal/linux: allow multiple starts of event
> > monitor") Cc:stable@intel.com
>
> stable@dpdk.org
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
>
>
>
> > ---
> > lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c index
> > bde55a3d92..4646e8a550 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> > +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> > @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ rte_dev_event_monitor_stop(void)
> > close(rte_intr_fd_get(intr_handle));
> > rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
> > intr_handle = NULL;
> > + ret = 0;
> >
> > monitor_refcount--;
> >
>
> This change looks ok to me.
> Harman, Long, wdyt?
The change looks good to me.
Long
02/03/2022 11:53, Long Li:
> > Subject: Re: [DPDK] /lib/eal: fix failed to stop device monitor error
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > The title should start with eal/linux:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:01 AM <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> > >
> > > The ret value in rte_dev_event_monitor_stop stands for whether the
> > > monitor has been successfully closed ,and should not bind with
> > > rte_intr_callback_unregister,so once it goes to the right exit point
> > > of rte_dev_event_monitor, the ret value should be set to 0.
> > >
> > > Also ,the refmonitor count has been carefully evaluated ,the value
> > > change from 1 to 0 ,so there is no potential memory leak failure.
> >
> > Please, fix formatting around ',': a space should be after.
> >
> >
> > Is it a real issue you noticed? Or a theoretical issue based on code review,
> > reported by a static code analysis tool?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1fef6ced07f3 ("eal/linux: allow multiple starts of event
> > > monitor") Cc:stable@intel.com
> >
> > stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > > ---
> > > lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c index
> > > bde55a3d92..4646e8a550 100644
> > > --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> > > +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_dev.c
> > > @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ rte_dev_event_monitor_stop(void)
> > > close(rte_intr_fd_get(intr_handle));
> > > rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
> > > intr_handle = NULL;
> > > + ret = 0;
> > >
> > > monitor_refcount--;
> > >
> >
> > This change looks ok to me.
> > Harman, Long, wdyt?
>
> The change looks good to me.
Applied, thanks.
@@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ rte_dev_event_monitor_stop(void)
close(rte_intr_fd_get(intr_handle));
rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
intr_handle = NULL;
+ ret = 0;
monitor_refcount--;