[v2] vhost: fix external message handlers

Message ID 20220308094422.25685-1-david.marchand@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Marchand
Headers
Series [v2] vhost: fix external message handlers |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/github-robot: build fail github build: failed
ci/iol-aarch64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-abi-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS

Commit Message

David Marchand March 8, 2022, 9:44 a.m. UTC
  Following a rework, external message handlers were receiving a pointer
to a vhost_user message (as stated in the API), but lost the ability to
interact with fds attached to the message.
Restore the original layout and put a build check and reminders.

Bugzilla ID: 953
Fixes: 5e0099dc709e ("vhost: remove payload size limitation")

Reported-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- fixed build with clang,

---
 lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 8 ++++----
 lib/vhost/vhost_user.h | 7 +++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Maxime Coquelin March 8, 2022, 10:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On 3/8/22 10:44, David Marchand wrote:
> Following a rework, external message handlers were receiving a pointer
> to a vhost_user message (as stated in the API), but lost the ability to
> interact with fds attached to the message.
> Restore the original layout and put a build check and reminders.
> 
> Bugzilla ID: 953
> Fixes: 5e0099dc709e ("vhost: remove payload size limitation")
> 
> Reported-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - fixed build with clang,
> 
> ---
>   lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 8 ++++----
>   lib/vhost/vhost_user.h | 7 +++++--
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> index 723c6890c3..589b950458 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> @@ -3023,8 +3023,8 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
>   
>   	handled = false;
>   	if (dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle) {
> -		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle)(dev->vid,
> -				(void *)&ctx.msg);
> +		RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vhu_msg_context, msg) != 0);
> +		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle)(dev->vid, &ctx);
>   		switch (ret) {
>   		case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY:
>   			send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx);
> @@ -3069,8 +3069,8 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
>   skip_to_post_handle:
>   	if (ret != RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR &&
>   			dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) {
> -		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(dev->vid,
> -				(void *)&ctx.msg);
> +		RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vhu_msg_context, msg) != 0);
> +		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(dev->vid, &ctx);
>   		switch (ret) {
>   		case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY:
>   			send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx);
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
> index be53669f3b..c946cc2ef4 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
> @@ -152,10 +152,13 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
>   	/* Nothing should be added after the payload */
>   } __rte_packed VhostUserMsg;
>   
> -struct vhu_msg_context {
> +/* Note: this structure and VhostUserMsg can't be changed carelessly as
> + * external message handlers rely on them.
> + */
> +struct __rte_packed vhu_msg_context {
> +	VhostUserMsg msg;
>   	int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
>   	int fd_num;
> -	VhostUserMsg msg;
>   };
>   
>   #define VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE offsetof(VhostUserMsg, payload.u64)

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime
  
Poczatek, Jakub March 8, 2022, 2:04 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi everyone, 

> Following a rework, external message handlers were receiving a pointer 
> to a vhost_user message (as stated in the API), but lost the ability 
> to interact with fds attached to the message.
> Restore the original layout and put a build check and reminders.
> 
> Bugzilla ID: 953
> Fixes: 5e0099dc709e ("vhost: remove payload size limitation")
> 
> Reported-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - fixed build with clang,
> 
> ---

Tested-by: Jakub Poczatek <Jakub.poczatek@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Poczatek <Jakub.poczatek@intel.com>
  
Christophe Fontaine March 8, 2022, 2:47 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 10:44 AM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Following a rework, external message handlers were receiving a pointer
> to a vhost_user message (as stated in the API), but lost the ability to
> interact with fds attached to the message.
> Restore the original layout and put a build check and reminders.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 953
> Fixes: 5e0099dc709e ("vhost: remove payload size limitation")
>
> Reported-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - fixed build with clang,
>
> ---
>  lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 8 ++++----
>  lib/vhost/vhost_user.h | 7 +++++--
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> index 723c6890c3..589b950458 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> @@ -3023,8 +3023,8 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
>
>         handled = false;
>         if (dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle) {
> -               ret = (*dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle)(dev->vid,
> -                               (void *)&ctx.msg);
> +               RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vhu_msg_context, msg) != 0);
> +               ret = (*dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle)(dev->vid, &ctx);
>                 switch (ret) {
>                 case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY:
>                         send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx);
> @@ -3069,8 +3069,8 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
>  skip_to_post_handle:
>         if (ret != RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR &&
>                         dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) {
> -               ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(dev->vid,
> -                               (void *)&ctx.msg);
> +               RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vhu_msg_context, msg) != 0);
> +               ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(dev->vid, &ctx);
>                 switch (ret) {
>                 case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY:
>                         send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx);
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
> index be53669f3b..c946cc2ef4 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
> @@ -152,10 +152,13 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
>         /* Nothing should be added after the payload */
>  } __rte_packed VhostUserMsg;
>
> -struct vhu_msg_context {
> +/* Note: this structure and VhostUserMsg can't be changed carelessly as
> + * external message handlers rely on them.
> + */
> +struct __rte_packed vhu_msg_context {
> +       VhostUserMsg msg;
>         int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
>         int fd_num;
> -       VhostUserMsg msg;
>  };
>
>  #define VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE offsetof(VhostUserMsg, payload.u64)
> --
> 2.23.0
>

Sorry to have missed that test with virtio-crypto ; I'll create
another thread to talk about the VhostUserMsg extension.

Reviewed-by: Christophe Fontaine <cfontain@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Christophe
  
David Marchand March 8, 2022, 3:06 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 10:45 AM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Following a rework, external message handlers were receiving a pointer
> to a vhost_user message (as stated in the API), but lost the ability to
> interact with fds attached to the message.
> Restore the original layout and put a build check and reminders.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 953
> Fixes: 5e0099dc709e ("vhost: remove payload size limitation")
>
> Reported-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jakub Poczatek <jakub.poczatek@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Poczatek <jakub.poczatek@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Fontaine <cfontain@redhat.com>

Applied, thanks.
  

Patch

diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
index 723c6890c3..589b950458 100644
--- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
+++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
@@ -3023,8 +3023,8 @@  vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
 
 	handled = false;
 	if (dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle) {
-		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle)(dev->vid,
-				(void *)&ctx.msg);
+		RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vhu_msg_context, msg) != 0);
+		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle)(dev->vid, &ctx);
 		switch (ret) {
 		case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY:
 			send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx);
@@ -3069,8 +3069,8 @@  vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
 skip_to_post_handle:
 	if (ret != RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR &&
 			dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) {
-		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(dev->vid,
-				(void *)&ctx.msg);
+		RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vhu_msg_context, msg) != 0);
+		ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(dev->vid, &ctx);
 		switch (ret) {
 		case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY:
 			send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx);
diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
index be53669f3b..c946cc2ef4 100644
--- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
+++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.h
@@ -152,10 +152,13 @@  typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
 	/* Nothing should be added after the payload */
 } __rte_packed VhostUserMsg;
 
-struct vhu_msg_context {
+/* Note: this structure and VhostUserMsg can't be changed carelessly as
+ * external message handlers rely on them.
+ */
+struct __rte_packed vhu_msg_context {
+	VhostUserMsg msg;
 	int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
 	int fd_num;
-	VhostUserMsg msg;
 };
 
 #define VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE offsetof(VhostUserMsg, payload.u64)