diff mbox series

[v1,1/2] net/mlx5: disallow duplicated tag index in pattern template

Message ID 20230516054329.1397016-2-rongweil@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Raslan Darawsheh
Headers
Series disallow duplicated tag index |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Rongwei Liu May 16, 2023, 5:43 a.m. UTC 
  Duplicated tag index in pattern template will most likely cause
matching failures such as "template tag index is 0 data mask 0xff /
tag index is 0 data mask 0xffff / end"

If the upper layer application needs to match the same tag twice
with different masks, it should be consolidated into one rte_item
with the desired mask.

"template tag index is 0 data mask 0xff / tag index is 0 data mask
0xff00 / end" should be present as "template tag index is 0 data mask
0xffff / end"

Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Ori Kam May 17, 2023, 5:11 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Rongwei,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 8:43 AM
> 
> Duplicated tag index in pattern template will most likely cause
> matching failures such as "template tag index is 0 data mask 0xff /
> tag index is 0 data mask 0xffff / end"
> 
> If the upper layer application needs to match the same tag twice
> with different masks, it should be consolidated into one rte_item
> with the desired mask.
> 
> "template tag index is 0 data mask 0xff / tag index is 0 data mask
> 0xff00 / end" should be present as "template tag index is 0 data mask
> 0xffff / end"
> 
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c
index 7e0ee8d883..78011584eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c
@@ -4831,8 +4831,9 @@  flow_hw_pattern_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 			 struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
-	int i;
+	int i, tag_idx;
 	bool items_end = false;
+	uint32_t tag_bitmap = 0;
 
 	if (!attr->ingress && !attr->egress && !attr->transfer)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR, NULL,
@@ -4874,16 +4875,26 @@  flow_hw_pattern_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 		switch (type) {
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TAG:
 		{
-			int reg;
 			const struct rte_flow_item_tag *tag =
 				(const struct rte_flow_item_tag *)items[i].spec;
 
-			reg = flow_hw_get_reg_id(RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TAG, tag->index);
-			if (reg == REG_NON)
+			if (tag == NULL)
+				return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+							  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
+							  NULL,
+							  "Tag spec is NULL");
+			tag_idx = flow_hw_get_reg_id(RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TAG, tag->index);
+			if (tag_idx == REG_NON)
 				return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 							  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
 							  NULL,
 							  "Unsupported tag index");
+			if (tag_bitmap & (1 << tag_idx))
+				return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+							  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+							  NULL,
+							  "Duplicated tag index");
+			tag_bitmap |= 1 << tag_idx;
 			break;
 		}
 		case MLX5_RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TAG:
@@ -4897,6 +4908,12 @@  flow_hw_pattern_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 							  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
 							  NULL,
 							  "Unsupported internal tag index");
+			if (tag_bitmap & (1 << tag->index))
+				return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+							  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+							  NULL,
+							  "Duplicated tag index");
+			tag_bitmap |= 1 << tag->index;
 			break;
 		}
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_REPRESENTED_PORT: