test/dma: fix for buffer auto free

Message ID 20231101101809.3546500-1-amitprakashs@marvell.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers
Series test/dma: fix for buffer auto free |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/loongarch-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/loongarch-unit-testing success Unit Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/intel-Functional success Functional PASS
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-sample-apps-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-arm64-testing success Testing PASS

Commit Message

Amit Prakash Shukla Nov. 1, 2023, 10:18 a.m. UTC
  Buffer auto free test failed for more than 1 dma device as the device
initialization for the test was been done only for the first dma device.
This changeset fixes the same.

Fixes: 877cb3e37426 ("dmadev: add buffer auto free offload")

Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
---
 app/test/test_dmadev.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Hemant Agrawal Nov. 1, 2023, 2:08 p.m. UTC | #1
> diff --git a/app/test/test_dmadev.c b/app/test/test_dmadev.c index
> 216f84b6bb..3d4cb37ee6 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ struct dma_add_test dma_add_test[] = {
>  	[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE] = {.name = "m2d_auto_free", .enabled =
> false},  };
> 
> +static bool dev_init;

[Hemant]  should't it be per device id? 

> +
>  static void
>  __rte_format_printf(3, 4)
>  print_err(const char *func, int lineno, const char *format, ...) @@ -837,7
> +839,6 @@ test_m2d_auto_free(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan)
>  	};
>  	uint32_t buf_cnt1, buf_cnt2;
>  	struct rte_mempool_ops *ops;
> -	static bool dev_init;
>  	uint16_t nb_done = 0;
>  	bool dma_err = false;
>  	int retry = 100;
> @@ -1011,6 +1012,7 @@ test_dmadev_instance(int16_t dev_id)
> 
>  	if ((info.dev_capa & RTE_DMA_CAPA_M2D_AUTO_FREE) &&
>  	    dma_add_test[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE].enabled == true) {
> +		dev_init = false;
>  		if (runtest("m2d_auto_free", test_m2d_auto_free, 128,
> dev_id, vchan,
>  			    CHECK_ERRS) < 0)
>  			goto err;
> --
> 2.25.1
  
fengchengwen Nov. 2, 2023, 2:06 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Amit,

  I prefer not use static variable to control it because it introduce many coupling.

  Suggest add one function which prepare the test_m2d_auto_free, like prepare_m2d_auto_free

	if ((info.dev_capa & RTE_DMA_CAPA_M2D_AUTO_FREE) &&
	    dma_add_test[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE].enabled == true) {
                if (prepare_m2d_auto_free(dev_id) != 0)
                    goto err;
		if (runtest("m2d_auto_free", test_m2d_auto_free, 128, dev_id, vchan,
			    CHECK_ERRS) < 0)
			goto err;
	}	

In the new function, could do reinit vchan just like the beginging test_m2d_auto_free.
static int prepare_m2d_auto_free(int dev_id) {
	const struct rte_dma_vchan_conf qconf = {
		.direction = RTE_DMA_DIR_MEM_TO_DEV,
		.nb_desc = TEST_RINGSIZE,
		.auto_free.m2d.pool = pool,
		.dst_port.port_type = RTE_DMA_PORT_PCIE,
		.dst_port.pcie.coreid = 0,
	};
	/* Stop the device to reconfigure vchan because should use Mem-to-Dev mode. */
	if (rte_dma_stop(dev_id) < 0)
		ERR_RETURN("Error stopping device %u\n", dev_id);
	if (rte_dma_vchan_setup(dev_id, vchan, &qconf) < 0)
		ERR_RETURN("Error with queue configuration\n");
	if (rte_dma_start(dev_id) != 0)
		ERR_RETURN("Error with rte_dma_start()\n");
	return 0;
}



Also I found a bug in test_m2d_auto_free function, if above path taken:
	if (rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, src, NR_MBUF) != 0) {
		printf("alloc src mbufs failed.\n");
		ret = -1;
		goto done;
	}

done:
	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(dst, NR_MBUF);
	/* If the test passes source buffer will be freed in hardware. */
	if (ret < 0)
		rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&src[nb_done], (NR_MBUF - nb_done));
		----- then it will free invalid mbuf to pool because src was not success init


On 2023/11/1 18:18, Amit Prakash Shukla wrote:
> Buffer auto free test failed for more than 1 dma device as the device
> initialization for the test was been done only for the first dma device.
> This changeset fixes the same.
> 
> Fixes: 877cb3e37426 ("dmadev: add buffer auto free offload")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_dmadev.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_dmadev.c b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> index 216f84b6bb..3d4cb37ee6 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ struct dma_add_test dma_add_test[] = {
>  	[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE] = {.name = "m2d_auto_free", .enabled = false},
>  };
>  
> +static bool dev_init;
> +
>  static void
>  __rte_format_printf(3, 4)
>  print_err(const char *func, int lineno, const char *format, ...)
> @@ -837,7 +839,6 @@ test_m2d_auto_free(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan)
>  	};
>  	uint32_t buf_cnt1, buf_cnt2;
>  	struct rte_mempool_ops *ops;
> -	static bool dev_init;
>  	uint16_t nb_done = 0;
>  	bool dma_err = false;
>  	int retry = 100;
> @@ -1011,6 +1012,7 @@ test_dmadev_instance(int16_t dev_id)
>  
>  	if ((info.dev_capa & RTE_DMA_CAPA_M2D_AUTO_FREE) &&
>  	    dma_add_test[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE].enabled == true) {
> +		dev_init = false;
>  		if (runtest("m2d_auto_free", test_m2d_auto_free, 128, dev_id, vchan,
>  			    CHECK_ERRS) < 0)
>  			goto err;
>
  
Amit Prakash Shukla Nov. 2, 2023, 9:40 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Chengwen,

Thanks for the review and feedback. I will send v2 with suggested changes.

Thanks,
Amit Shukla

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 7:37 AM
> To: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>; Kevin Laatz
> <kevin.laatz@intel.com>; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> conor.walsh@intel.com; Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>;
> g.singh@nxp.com; sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com;
> cheng1.jiang@intel.com; Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram
> <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>;
> mb@smartsharesystems.com
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] test/dma: fix for buffer auto free
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Amit,
> 
>   I prefer not use static variable to control it because it introduce many
> coupling.
> 
>   Suggest add one function which prepare the test_m2d_auto_free, like
> prepare_m2d_auto_free
> 
> 	if ((info.dev_capa & RTE_DMA_CAPA_M2D_AUTO_FREE) &&
> 	    dma_add_test[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE].enabled == true) {
>                 if (prepare_m2d_auto_free(dev_id) != 0)
>                     goto err;
> 		if (runtest("m2d_auto_free", test_m2d_auto_free, 128,
> dev_id, vchan,
> 			    CHECK_ERRS) < 0)
> 			goto err;
> 	}
> 
> In the new function, could do reinit vchan just like the beginging
> test_m2d_auto_free.
> static int prepare_m2d_auto_free(int dev_id) {
> 	const struct rte_dma_vchan_conf qconf = {
> 		.direction = RTE_DMA_DIR_MEM_TO_DEV,
> 		.nb_desc = TEST_RINGSIZE,
> 		.auto_free.m2d.pool = pool,
> 		.dst_port.port_type = RTE_DMA_PORT_PCIE,
> 		.dst_port.pcie.coreid = 0,
> 	};
> 	/* Stop the device to reconfigure vchan because should use Mem-to-
> Dev mode. */
> 	if (rte_dma_stop(dev_id) < 0)
> 		ERR_RETURN("Error stopping device %u\n", dev_id);
> 	if (rte_dma_vchan_setup(dev_id, vchan, &qconf) < 0)
> 		ERR_RETURN("Error with queue configuration\n");
> 	if (rte_dma_start(dev_id) != 0)
> 		ERR_RETURN("Error with rte_dma_start()\n");
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> 
> 
> Also I found a bug in test_m2d_auto_free function, if above path taken:
> 	if (rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, src, NR_MBUF) != 0) {
> 		printf("alloc src mbufs failed.\n");
> 		ret = -1;
> 		goto done;
> 	}
> 
> done:
> 	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(dst, NR_MBUF);
> 	/* If the test passes source buffer will be freed in hardware. */
> 	if (ret < 0)
> 		rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&src[nb_done], (NR_MBUF -
> nb_done));
> 		----- then it will free invalid mbuf to pool because src was not
> success init
> 
> 

<snip>
  

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_dmadev.c b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
index 216f84b6bb..3d4cb37ee6 100644
--- a/app/test/test_dmadev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@  struct dma_add_test dma_add_test[] = {
 	[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE] = {.name = "m2d_auto_free", .enabled = false},
 };
 
+static bool dev_init;
+
 static void
 __rte_format_printf(3, 4)
 print_err(const char *func, int lineno, const char *format, ...)
@@ -837,7 +839,6 @@  test_m2d_auto_free(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan)
 	};
 	uint32_t buf_cnt1, buf_cnt2;
 	struct rte_mempool_ops *ops;
-	static bool dev_init;
 	uint16_t nb_done = 0;
 	bool dma_err = false;
 	int retry = 100;
@@ -1011,6 +1012,7 @@  test_dmadev_instance(int16_t dev_id)
 
 	if ((info.dev_capa & RTE_DMA_CAPA_M2D_AUTO_FREE) &&
 	    dma_add_test[TEST_M2D_AUTO_FREE].enabled == true) {
+		dev_init = false;
 		if (runtest("m2d_auto_free", test_m2d_auto_free, 128, dev_id, vchan,
 			    CHECK_ERRS) < 0)
 			goto err;