[5/5] net/hns3: refactor handle mailbox function

Message ID 20231108034434.559030-6-haijie1@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: Ferruh Yigit
Headers
Series net/hns3: fix and refactor mailbox code |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch warning coding style issues
ci/loongarch-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/loongarch-unit-testing success Unit Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/intel-Functional success Functional PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-sample-apps-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS

Commit Message

Jie Hai Nov. 8, 2023, 3:44 a.m. UTC
  From: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>

The mailbox messages of the PF and VF are processed in
the same function. The PF and VF call the same function
to process the messages. This code is excessive coupling
and isn't good for maintenance. Therefore, this patch
separates the interfaces that handle PF mailbox message
and handle VF mailbox message.

Fixes: 463e748964f5 ("net/hns3: support mailbox")
Fixes: 109e4dd1bd7a ("net/hns3: get link state change through mailbox")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c    |  2 +-
 drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c |  4 +-
 drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c       | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h       |  3 +-
 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c
index 941d047bf1bd..18543e88edc7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@  hns3_interrupt_handler(void *param)
 		hns3_warn(hw, "received reset interrupt");
 		hns3_schedule_reset(hns);
 	} else if (event_cause == HNS3_VECTOR0_EVENT_MBX) {
-		hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+		hns3pf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
 	} else if (event_cause != HNS3_VECTOR0_EVENT_PTP) {
 		hns3_warn(hw, "received unknown event: vector0_int_stat:0x%x "
 			  "ras_int_stat:0x%x cmdq_int_stat:0x%x",
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c
index 2da73857ac56..3ae4f965bb0b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@  hns3vf_interrupt_handler(void *param)
 		hns3_schedule_reset(hns);
 		break;
 	case HNS3VF_VECTOR0_EVENT_MBX:
-		hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+		hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@  hns3vf_get_push_lsc_cap(struct hns3_hw *hw)
 		 * driver has to actively handle the HNS3_MBX_LINK_STAT_CHANGE
 		 * mailbox from PF driver to get this capability.
 		 */
-		hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+		hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
 		if (__atomic_load_n(&vf->pf_push_lsc_cap, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) !=
 			HNS3_PF_PUSH_LSC_CAP_UNKNOWN)
 			break;
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
index 43195ff184b1..9cdbc1668a17 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@  hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode,
 			return -EIO;
 		}
 
-		hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+		hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
 		rte_delay_us(HNS3_WAIT_RESP_US);
 
 		if (hw->mbx_resp.received_match_resp)
@@ -372,9 +372,57 @@  hns3_handle_mbx_msg_out_intr(struct hns3_hw *hw)
 }
 
 void
-hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
+hns3pf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
+{
+	struct hns3_cmq_ring *crq = &hw->cmq.crq;
+	struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *req;
+	struct hns3_cmd_desc *desc;
+	uint16_t flag;
+
+	rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+
+	while (!hns3_cmd_crq_empty(hw)) {
+		if (__atomic_load_n(&hw->reset.disable_cmd, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
+			rte_spinlock_unlock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+			return;
+		}
+		desc = &crq->desc[crq->next_to_use];
+		req = (struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *)desc->data;
+
+		flag = rte_le_to_cpu_16(crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag);
+		if (unlikely(!hns3_get_bit(flag, HNS3_CMDQ_RX_OUTVLD_B))) {
+			hns3_warn(hw,
+				  "dropped invalid mailbox message, code = %u",
+				  req->msg.code);
+
+			/* dropping/not processing this invalid message */
+			crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag = 0;
+			hns3_mbx_ring_ptr_move_crq(crq);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		switch (req->msg.code) {
+		case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_LINK_STATUS:
+			hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(hw, req);
+			break;
+		default:
+			hns3_err(hw, "received unsupported(%u) mbx msg",
+				 req->msg.code);
+			break;
+		}
+		crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag = 0;
+		hns3_mbx_ring_ptr_move_crq(crq);
+	}
+
+	/* Write back CMDQ_RQ header pointer, IMP need this pointer */
+	hns3_write_dev(hw, HNS3_CMDQ_RX_HEAD_REG, crq->next_to_use);
+
+	rte_spinlock_unlock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+}
+
+void
+hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
 {
-	struct hns3_adapter *hns = HNS3_DEV_HW_TO_ADAPTER(hw);
 	struct hns3_cmq_ring *crq = &hw->cmq.crq;
 	struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req;
 	struct hns3_cmd_desc *desc;
@@ -385,7 +433,7 @@  hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
 	rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
 
 	handle_out = (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ||
-		      !rte_thread_is_intr()) && hns->is_vf;
+		      !rte_thread_is_intr());
 	if (handle_out) {
 		/*
 		 * Currently, any threads in the primary and secondary processes
@@ -430,8 +478,7 @@  hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		handle_out = hns->is_vf && desc->opcode == 0;
-		if (handle_out) {
+		if (desc->opcode == 0) {
 			/* Message already processed by other thread */
 			crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag = 0;
 			hns3_mbx_ring_ptr_move_crq(crq);
@@ -448,16 +495,6 @@  hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
 		case HNS3_MBX_ASSERTING_RESET:
 			hns3_handle_asserting_reset(hw, req);
 			break;
-		case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_LINK_STATUS:
-			/*
-			 * This message is reported by the firmware and is
-			 * reported in 'struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd' format.
-			 * Therefore, we should cast the req variable to
-			 * 'struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd' and then process it.
-			 */
-			hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(hw,
-				(struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *)req);
-			break;
 		case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_VLAN_INFO:
 			/*
 			 * When the PVID configuration status of VF device is
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h
index 360e91c30eb9..967d9df3bcac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h
@@ -209,7 +209,8 @@  struct hns3_pf_rst_done_cmd {
 	((crq)->next_to_use = ((crq)->next_to_use + 1) % (crq)->desc_num)
 
 struct hns3_hw;
-void hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw);
+void hns3pf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw);
+void hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw);
 void hns3vf_mbx_setup(struct hns3_vf_to_pf_msg *req,
 		      uint8_t code, uint8_t subcode);
 int hns3vf_mbx_send(struct hns3_hw *hw,