From patchwork Mon Sep 7 16:49:29 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Ling, WeiX" X-Patchwork-Id: 76650 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BFCA04B9; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4FF1C0CE; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA84029AC for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:06:08 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: rSgahtLZO5hYZs4t4rJ0DCOfC4wt424appLFHjlHI/v0EMX1LEMyHY1BAimM1ATdd8fcgmhC2i f+KigTxCRu9A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9736"; a="145685120" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,401,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="145685120" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Sep 2020 02:06:08 -0700 IronPort-SDR: q6Y4VQARZuGO/VNC9+pVItE84USvfwLTE42ZBaDj+3eIqS8ns51P8i4zg0aRd14XvPpa/Fs3Ov cTTuEBJ3EmEg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,401,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="316811459" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.240.183.222]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2020 02:06:06 -0700 From: lingwei To: dts@dpdk.org Cc: lingwei Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:49:29 +0000 Message-Id: <20200907164929.51247-6-weix.ling@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200907164929.51247-1-weix.ling@intel.com> References: <20200907164929.51247-1-weix.ling@intel.com> Subject: [dts] [dts 5/5] test_plans/vmdq_test_plan:update test plan to sync with testcase X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" Signed-off-by: lingwei --- test_plans/vmdq_test_plan.rst | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/test_plans/vmdq_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/vmdq_test_plan.rst index 1f19e6f..55ea0d7 100644 --- a/test_plans/vmdq_test_plan.rst +++ b/test_plans/vmdq_test_plan.rst @@ -66,7 +66,10 @@ Prerequisites to the pools numbers(e.g: for FVL spirit, it's 63, inclusive) as well as the MAC address from 52:54:00:12:[port_index]:00 to 52:54:00:12:[port_index]:3e and the VLAN user priority field increments from 0 to 7 (inclusive) for each VLAN ID. In our case port_index = 0 or 1. - +-Case config:: + If test max queues per port 1024, need to set the "CONFIG_RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT=1024" in ./config/common_base, + and need to set the "define MAX_QUEUES 1024" in ./examples/vmdq/main.c and re-build DPDK. + Note: different NIC, the MAX_QUEUES is different, eg: Fortville is 1024. Test Case: Measure VMDQ pools queues ------------------------------------