From patchwork Fri Sep 30 05:46:44 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ke Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 117167 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19D3A034C; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 07:47:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97AB41109; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 07:47:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E7B40E5A for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 07:47:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1664516859; x=1696052859; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kOhKL13QYIYfZbWO3Ziwe7+r+248sSzXOWCouflCMSY=; b=SlT1BnbAckLVmqwSH4nj2kHWngjCmQI0IF9JsRPdL4UkKb0VOWTbjCG7 6TdOe7+Z7XiibsYT4mDNNl/AXPhV92ldVX/Aq18eAqazI394kr3vgJm5e m1GaWBI1Sn+M1quwrYbYR7dqXAITE1gI+DS6qUiPbHXCAYR8kdB5uh0nY XMHKMUzjBQQHHH3AgrdlkNxPNp64kyWediKsxiU824IOLpOeDioj885No CiXm2E1+tQxGU5Vt0EkCkb1ZNw70u78EQAdBOnRGJZ7tuhDfwHcbeA7u7 ZJKcNmvQ3UHExojLT99vbJEKmfcIwBXAKqOtuPQqhJHODH+XCVmcAFUS1 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10485"; a="281822336" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,357,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="281822336" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Sep 2022 22:47:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10485"; a="748116332" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,357,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="748116332" Received: from bmca4bf0170a856.sh.intel.com (HELO DPDK-XUKE-LAB.sh.intel.com) ([10.67.115.115]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2022 22:47:36 -0700 From: Ke Xu To: dts@dpdk.org Cc: qi.fu@intel.com, lijuan.tu@intel.com, Ke Xu Subject: [DTS][PATCH V1 1/4] test_plans/ice_dcf_switch_filter: update existing TO_VF action cases to cover port representor action from not covered vf original action Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 05:46:44 +0000 Message-Id: <20220930054647.545932-2-ke1.xu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220930054647.545932-1-ke1.xu@intel.com> References: <20220930054647.545932-1-ke1.xu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Deprecated TO_VF action contains a 'vf original' action which is not covered in previous tests. This commit applys equivilant 'vf original' rule to previous cases for 'vf id' action to cover 'vf original' action. Signed-off-by: Ke Xu --- .../ice_dcf_switch_filter_test_plan.rst | 430 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 288 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) diff --git a/test_plans/ice_dcf_switch_filter_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/ice_dcf_switch_filter_test_plan.rst index 7e161947..7eab578a 100644 --- a/test_plans/ice_dcf_switch_filter_test_plan.rst +++ b/test_plans/ice_dcf_switch_filter_test_plan.rst @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ Test case: MAC_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth src is 00:00:00:00:00:01 dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 type is 0x0800 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth src is 00:00:00:00:00:01 dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 type is 0x0800 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ Test case: MAC_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth src is 00:00:00:00:00:01 dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 type is 0x0800 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth src is 00:00:00:00:00:01 dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 type is 0x0800 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -255,22 +257,23 @@ Test case: MAC_PAY sendp([Ether(src="00:00:00:00:00:01",dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/Raw("x" *80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(src="00:00:00:00:00:02",dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/Raw("x" *80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether(src="00:00:00:00:00:01",dst="00:11:22:33:44:54")/IP()/Raw("x" *80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether(src="00:00:00:00:00:01",dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IPv6()/Raw("x" *80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_FRAG ======================== @@ -278,6 +281,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_FRAG 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -292,6 +296,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_FRAG 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -300,7 +305,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_FRAG sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2,frag=5)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a3")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2,frag=5)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -309,7 +314,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_FRAG sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=5,ttl=2,frag=5)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3,frag=5)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: @@ -317,7 +322,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_FRAG testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_PAY ======================= @@ -325,6 +330,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 proto is 6 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 proto is 6 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -339,6 +345,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 proto is 6 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 proto is 6 tos is 4 ttl is 2 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -347,7 +354,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/TCP()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a3")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/TCP()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -357,15 +364,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/TCP()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/UDP()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY =========================== @@ -373,6 +381,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -387,6 +396,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -395,7 +405,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/UDP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a3")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/UDP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -406,15 +416,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/UDP(sport=30,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/UDP(sport=25,dport=19)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_TCP_PAY =========================== @@ -422,6 +433,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_TCP_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -436,6 +448,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_TCP_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -444,7 +457,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_TCP_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a3")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -455,15 +468,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_TCP_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/TCP(sport=30,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/TCP(sport=25,dport=19)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_IGMP ======================== @@ -471,6 +485,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_IGMP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 0x02 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 0x02 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -485,6 +500,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_IGMP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 0x02 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 0x02 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -493,21 +509,22 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_IGMP sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/IGMP()/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/TCP()/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/UDP()/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_srcip_dstip =============================== @@ -518,6 +535,7 @@ Therefore, if a rule carries src ipv6, dst ipv6, it can not take any other field 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 src is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1536 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 src is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1536 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -532,6 +550,7 @@ Therefore, if a rule carries src ipv6, dst ipv6, it can not take any other field 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 src is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1536 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 src is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1536 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -541,7 +560,7 @@ Therefore, if a rule carries src ipv6, dst ipv6, it can not take any other field sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1536", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020")/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1536", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020")/IPv6ExtHdrFragment()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1537", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020")/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -549,15 +568,16 @@ Therefore, if a rule carries src ipv6, dst ipv6, it can not take any other field sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1537", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020")/IPv6ExtHdrFragment()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1536", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2023")/IPv6ExtHdrFragment()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_dstip_tc ============================ @@ -565,6 +585,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_dstip_tc 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -579,6 +600,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_dstip_tc 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -588,7 +610,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_dstip_tc sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/IPv6ExtHdrFragment()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a3")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -598,15 +620,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_dstip_tc sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2023",tc=3)/IPv6ExtHdrFragment()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=4)/IPv6ExtHdrFragment()/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_UDP_PAY =========================== @@ -614,6 +637,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_UDP_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -628,6 +652,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_UDP_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -636,7 +661,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/UDP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a3")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/UDP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -645,15 +670,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/UDP(sport=30,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/UDP(sport=25,dport=19)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_TCP ======================= @@ -661,6 +687,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_TCP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -675,6 +702,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_TCP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv6 dst is CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020 tc is 3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -683,7 +711,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_TCP sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a3")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -692,15 +720,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_TCP sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/TCP(sport=30,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IPv6(src="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:1518", dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020",tc=3)/TCP(sport=25,dport=19)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) ========================================================== @@ -708,6 +737,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -722,6 +752,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -731,7 +762,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3",frag=5)/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3",frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3",frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -739,15 +770,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.4", dst="192.168.0.3",frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.5",frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) ========================================================= @@ -755,6 +787,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -769,6 +802,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -778,7 +812,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -786,15 +820,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.4", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.5")/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) ============================================================= @@ -802,6 +837,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -816,6 +852,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -824,21 +861,22 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=50,dport=23) /Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=20,dport=23) /Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=50,dport=19) /Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) ========================================================= @@ -846,6 +884,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -860,6 +899,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -868,21 +908,22 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP(sport=50,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP(sport=29,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP(sport=50,dport=100)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) ============================================================== @@ -890,6 +931,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -904,6 +946,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -913,7 +956,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3" ,frag=5)/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3" ,frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3" ,frag=5)/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -922,15 +965,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_FRAG (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.4", dst="192.168.0.3" ,frag=5)/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.5" ,frag=5)/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) ============================================================= @@ -938,6 +982,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -952,6 +997,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -961,7 +1007,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3") /TCP()/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3") /TCP()/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -970,15 +1016,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_PAY (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.4", dst="192.168.0.3") /TCP()/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.5") /TCP()/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) ================================================================= @@ -986,6 +1033,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1000,6 +1048,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1008,21 +1057,22 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=50,dport=23)/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=20,dport=23)/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=50,dport=29)/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) ============================================================= @@ -1030,6 +1080,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1044,6 +1095,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / udp / vxlan vni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1052,21 +1104,22 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_VXLAN_MAC_IPV4_TCP (not support in 20.05) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP(sport=20,dport=23)/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=19)/Raw("x" * 80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_PAY =================================== @@ -1074,6 +1127,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1088,6 +1142,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1097,7 +1152,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3" ,frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -1109,15 +1164,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.4", dst="192.168.1.3" ,frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.5" ,frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_UDP_PAY ====================================== @@ -1125,6 +1181,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_UDP_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1139,6 +1196,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_UDP_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 dst is 192.168.0.3 / udp src is 50 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1147,7 +1205,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=50,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=50,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -1157,15 +1215,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=20,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3")/UDP(sport=50,dport=19)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_TCP ================================== @@ -1173,6 +1232,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_TCP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1187,6 +1247,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_TCP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1195,7 +1256,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_TCP sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -1205,15 +1266,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_IPV4_TCP sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=20,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=39)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_PAY ====================================== @@ -1221,6 +1283,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1235,6 +1298,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1244,7 +1308,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3" ,frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -1258,15 +1322,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.4", dst="192.168.1.3" ,frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.5" ,frag=5)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY ========================================== @@ -1274,6 +1339,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1288,6 +1354,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 0x8 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1296,7 +1363,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/UDP(sport=25,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/UDP(sport=25,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) @@ -1307,15 +1374,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_UDP_PAY sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/UDP(sport=2,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=0x8)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/UDP(sport=25,dport=20)/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_TCP ====================================== @@ -1323,6 +1391,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_TCP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1337,6 +1406,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_TCP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst is 192.168.0.1 / nvgre tni is 2 / eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.1.2 dst is 192.168.1.3 / tcp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1345,7 +1415,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_TCP sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) @@ -1356,15 +1426,16 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NVGRE_MAC_IPV4_TCP sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=1,dport=23)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP(sport=25,dport=20)/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_NODE ============================= @@ -1372,6 +1443,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_NODE 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1386,6 +1458,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_NODE 2. DUT create switch filter rules for MAC_IPV4_PFCP_NODE to VF1:: flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1397,22 +1470,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_NODE sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_SESSION ================================ @@ -1420,6 +1494,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_SESSION 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 2 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 2 / end get the message:: @@ -1434,6 +1509,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_SESSION 2. DUT create switch filter rules for MAC_IPV4_PFCP_SESSION to VF2:: flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 2 / end + flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 2 / end check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1445,22 +1521,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_PFCP_SESSION sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") - check port 4 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 4 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") - check the packets are not to port 4. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 4. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 4. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 4. Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_NODE ============================= @@ -1468,6 +1545,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_NODE 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 3 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 3 / end get the message:: @@ -1482,6 +1560,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_NODE 2. DUT create switch filter rules for MAC_IPV6_PFCP_NODE to VF3:: flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 3 / end + flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 3 / end check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1493,22 +1572,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_NODE sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_SESSION ================================ @@ -1516,6 +1596,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_SESSION 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1530,6 +1611,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_SESSION 2. DUT create switch filter rules for MAC_IPV6_PFCP_SESSION to VF1:: flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / pfcp s_field is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1541,22 +1623,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_PFCP_SESSION sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IP()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=1),iface="enp134s0f1") sendp(Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:11")/IPv6()/UDP(dport=8805)/PFCP(Sfield=0),iface="enp134s0f1") - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: IP multicast ======================= @@ -1564,6 +1647,7 @@ Test case: IP multicast 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst spec 224.0.0.0 dst mask 240.0.0.0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst spec 224.0.0.0 dst mask 240.0.0.0 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1578,6 +1662,7 @@ Test case: IP multicast 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst spec 224.0.0.0 dst mask 240.0.0.0 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 dst spec 224.0.0.0 dst mask 240.0.0.0 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1586,20 +1671,21 @@ Test case: IP multicast sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="239.0.0.0")/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="128.0.0.0")/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: L2 multicast ======================= @@ -1607,6 +1693,7 @@ Test case: L2 multicast 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst spec 01:00:5e:00:00:00 dst mask ff:ff:ff:80:00:00 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst spec 01:00:5e:00:00:00 dst mask ff:ff:ff:80:00:00 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1621,6 +1708,7 @@ Test case: L2 multicast 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst spec 01:00:5e:00:00:00 dst mask ff:ff:ff:80:00:00 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst spec 01:00:5e:00:00:00 dst mask ff:ff:ff:80:00:00 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1629,20 +1717,21 @@ Test case: L2 multicast sendp([Ether(dst="01:00:5e:7f:00:00")/IP()/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="01:00:5e:ff:00:00")/IP()/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOD ================================= @@ -1650,6 +1739,7 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOD 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8863 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8863 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1664,6 +1754,7 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOD 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8863 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8863 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1672,20 +1763,21 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOD sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/PPPoED()/PPP()/IP()/Raw("x" *80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/PPPoE()/PPP()/IP()/Raw("x" *80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOE ================================= @@ -1693,6 +1785,7 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOE 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8864 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8864 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1707,6 +1800,7 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOE 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8864 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x8864 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1715,20 +1809,21 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_PPPOE sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/PPPoE()/PPP()/IP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/PPPoED()/PPP()/IP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: ethertype filter_IPV6 ================================= @@ -1736,6 +1831,7 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_IPV6 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x86dd / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x86dd / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1750,6 +1846,7 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_IPV6 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x86dd / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth type is 0x86dd / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1759,20 +1856,21 @@ Test case: ethertype filter_IPV6 sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IPv6(dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020", tc=3)/TCP(dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55",type=0x8100)/Dot1Q(vlan=1,type=0x86dd)/IPv6(dst="CDCD:910A:2222:5498:8475:1111:3900:2020", tc=3)/TCP(dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/TCP(dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: UDP port filter_DHCP discovery ========================================= @@ -1783,6 +1881,7 @@ Therefore, for DHCP discovery packets, the udp srcport is 68 and the dstport is 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 68 dst is 67 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 68 dst is 67 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1797,6 +1896,7 @@ Therefore, for DHCP discovery packets, the udp srcport is 68 and the dstport is 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 68 dst is 67 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 68 dst is 67 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1805,21 +1905,22 @@ Therefore, for DHCP discovery packets, the udp srcport is 68 and the dstport is sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/UDP(sport=68,dport=67)/BOOTP(chaddr="3c:fd:fe:b2:43:90")/DHCP(options=[("message-type","discover"),"end"])/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/UDP(sport=63,dport=67)/BOOTP(chaddr="3c:fd:fe:b2:43:90")/DHCP(options=[("message-type","discover"),"end"])/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/UDP(sport=68,dport=69)/BOOTP(chaddr="3c:fd:fe:b2:43:90")/DHCP(options=[("message-type","discover"),"end"])/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: UDP port filter_DHCP offer ===================================== @@ -1829,6 +1930,7 @@ Description: For DHCP offer packets, the udp srcport is 67 and the dstport is 68 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 67 dst is 68 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 67 dst is 68 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1843,6 +1945,7 @@ Description: For DHCP offer packets, the udp srcport is 67 and the dstport is 68 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 67 dst is 68 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 67 dst is 68 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1851,21 +1954,22 @@ Description: For DHCP offer packets, the udp srcport is 67 and the dstport is 68 sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/UDP(sport=67,dport=68)/BOOTP(chaddr="3c:fd:fe:b2:43:90",yiaddr="192.168.1.0")/DHCP(options=[("message-type","offer"),"end"])/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/UDP(sport=63,dport=68)/BOOTP(chaddr="3c:fd:fe:b2:43:90",yiaddr="192.168.1.0")/DHCP(options=[("message-type","offer"),"end"])/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55")/IP()/UDP(sport=67,dport=63)/BOOTP(chaddr="3c:fd:fe:b2:43:90",yiaddr="192.168.1.0")/DHCP(options=[("message-type","offer"),"end"])/Raw("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: UDP port filter_VXLAN ================================ @@ -1875,6 +1979,7 @@ Description: The UDP dst port number used by VXLAN is 4789. 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp dst is 4789 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp dst is 4789 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1889,6 +1994,7 @@ Description: The UDP dst port number used by VXLAN is 4789. 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp dst is 4789 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp dst is 4789 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1897,20 +2003,21 @@ Description: The UDP dst port number used by VXLAN is 4789. sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="192.168.0.3",frag=5)/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="192.168.0.1")/NVGRE(TNI=2)/Ether()/IP(src="192.168.1.2", dst="192.168.1.3")/TCP()/Raw("x"*80)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_VLAN filter ========================== @@ -1918,6 +2025,7 @@ Test case: MAC_VLAN filter 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 / vlan tci is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 / vlan tci is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1932,6 +2040,7 @@ Test case: MAC_VLAN filter 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 / vlan tci is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 00:11:22:33:44:55 / vlan tci is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1940,21 +2049,22 @@ Test case: MAC_VLAN filter sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55",type=0x8100)/Dot1Q(vlan=1)/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/TCP()/Raw("X"*480)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:54",type=0x8100)/Dot1Q(vlan=1)/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/TCP()/Raw("X"*480)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55",type=0x8100)/Dot1Q(vlan=2)/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/TCP()/Raw("X"*480)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: VLAN filter ====================== @@ -1962,6 +2072,7 @@ Test case: VLAN filter 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan tci is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan tci is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -1976,6 +2087,7 @@ Test case: VLAN filter 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan tci is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan tci is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -1984,20 +2096,21 @@ Test case: VLAN filter sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55",type=0x8100)/Dot1Q(vlan=1)/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/TCP()/Raw("X"*480)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check port 3 receive the packets. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packets. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:55",type=0x8100)/Dot1Q(vlan=2)/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=2)/TCP()/Raw("X"*480)],iface="enp27s0f0",count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_L2TPv3 ========================== @@ -2005,6 +2118,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_L2TPv3 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2019,6 +2133,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_L2TPv3 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2027,22 +2142,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_L2TPv3 sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:12')/IP(src='192.168.0.2', proto=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x01')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:12')/IP(src='192.168.0.2', proto=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x02')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:12')/IP(src='192.168.1.2', proto=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x01')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:12')/IP(dst='192.168.0.2', proto=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x01')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_L2TPv3 ========================== @@ -2050,6 +2166,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_L2TPv3 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2064,6 +2181,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_L2TPv3 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / l2tpv3oip session_id is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2072,22 +2190,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_L2TPv3 sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:13')/IPv6(dst='1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888', nh=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x01')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:13')/IPv6(dst='1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888', nh=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x02')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:13')/IPv6(dst='1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:9999', nh=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x01')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst='00:11:22:33:44:13')/IPv6(src='1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888', nh=115)/L2TP('\x00\x00\x00\x01')/('X'*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_ESP ======================= @@ -2095,6 +2214,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_ESP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2109,6 +2229,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_ESP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2117,22 +2238,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_ESP sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", proto=50)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", proto=50)/ESP(spi=2)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", proto=50)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(dst="192.168.0.2", proto=50)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_ESP ======================= @@ -2140,6 +2262,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_ESP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2154,6 +2277,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_ESP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2162,22 +2286,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_ESP sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888", nh=50)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888", nh=50)/ESP(spi=2)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:9999", nh=50)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(src="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888", nh=50)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_AH ====================== @@ -2185,6 +2310,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_AH 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / ah spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / ah spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2199,6 +2325,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_AH 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / ah spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / ah spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2207,22 +2334,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_AH sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", proto=51)/AH(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.0.2", proto=51)/AH(spi=2)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.1.2", proto=51)/AH(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(dst="192.168.0.2", proto=51)/AH(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_AH ====================== @@ -2230,6 +2358,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_AH 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / ah spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / ah spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2244,6 +2373,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_AH 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / ah spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / ah spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2252,22 +2382,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_AH sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888", nh=51)/AH(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888", nh=51)/AH(spi=2)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:9999", nh=51)/AH(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(src="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888", nh=51)/AH(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV4_NAT-T-ESP ============================= @@ -2275,6 +2406,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NAT-T-ESP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2289,6 +2421,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NAT-T-ESP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.2 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2297,22 +2430,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV4_NAT-T-ESP sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.0.2")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.0.2")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=2)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(src="192.168.1.2")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IP(dst="192.168.0.2")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test case: MAC_IPV6_NAT-T-ESP ============================= @@ -2320,6 +2454,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_NAT-T-ESP 1. validate a rule:: testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow validate 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end get the message:: @@ -2334,6 +2469,7 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_NAT-T-ESP 2. create a rule:: testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end + testpmd> flow create 0 priority 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 dst is 1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888 / udp / esp spi is 1 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule exists in the list. @@ -2342,22 +2478,23 @@ Test case: MAC_IPV6_NAT-T-ESP sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check port 3 receive the packet. + check port 0 and port 3 receive the packet. send mismatched packets:: sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=2)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(dst="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:9999")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) sendp([Ether(dst="00:11:22:33:44:13")/IPv6(src="1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777:8888")/UDP(dport=4500)/ESP(spi=1)/("X"*480)], iface="enp27s0f0", count=1) - check the packets are not to port 3. + check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. 4. verify rules can be destroyed:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 check the rule not exists in the list. - send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3. + send matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 and port 3. Test Case: multirules test ========================== @@ -2375,6 +2512,7 @@ Subcase 1: add existing rules but with different vfs 2. create rules with same pattern items but to different vfs:: + testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions port_representor port_id 0 / end testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 1 / end testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8 / ipv4 src is 192.168.0.1 dst is 192.168.0.2 tos is 4 ttl is 3 / udp src is 25 dst is 23 / end actions represented_port ethdev_port_id 2 / end testpmd> flow list 0 @@ -2385,23 +2523,31 @@ Subcase 1: add existing rules but with different vfs sendp([Ether(dst="68:05:ca:8d:ed:a8")/IP(src="192.168.0.1",dst="192.168.0.2",tos=4,ttl=3)/UDP(sport=25,dport=23)/("X"*480)], iface="ens786f0", count=1) - check both port 3 and 4 receive the packet. + check port 0, port 3 and 4 receive the packet. 4. destroy the rule 0, and send the matched packets:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0 testpmd> flow list 0 - check only rule 1 exists in the list. - send the same matched packets, check only port 4 receives the packets. + check only rule 1 and rule 2 exists in the list. + send the same matched packets, check only port 3 and port 4 receives the packets. 5. destroy rule 1, send the matched packets:: testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 1 testpmd> flow list 0 + check only rule 2 exists in the list. + send the same matched packets, check only port 4 receives the packets. + +6. destroy rule 2, send the matched packets:: + + testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 2 + testpmd> flow list 0 + check no rule exists in the list - send the same matched packets, check the packets are not to port 3 and 4. + send the same matched packets, check the packets are not to port 0 or port 3 or 4. Subcase 2: add existing rules with the same vfs -----------------------------------------------